Obamagate: But Wait, There's More!
Russian Collusion Was A Fraud Then, And Is An Ongoing Fraud Now
Obamagate is quickly morphing into a political version of that (in)famous tag-line from infomercials of days gone by: “But wait….THERE’S MORE!”
The latest iteration of the “more” we can expect is, per DCIA John Ratcliffe, evidence that the Russian Collusion Hoax did in fact begin with Hillary Clinton, and the FBI intentionally facilitated her efforts to smear Donald Trump with what became the Steele Dossier.
And what that intelligence shows, Maria, is that part of this was a Hillary Clinton plan, but part of it was an FBI plan to be an accelerant to that fake Steele Dossier, to those fake Russia collusion claims by pouring oil on the fire, by amplifying the lie and bearing the truth of what was what Hillary Clinton was up to.
And you're right, Maria. John Brennan testified to John Durham in August of 2020. He also testified to the House Oversight Committee in 2022. Hillary Clinton testified before John Durham under oath in 2022. James Comey testified before the Senate Committee in September 2020. All of that's within the last five years.
As Federalist Editor Mollie Hemingway pointed out, the timeline of when several of the principals gave sworn testimony regarding the Russia Collusion Hoax establishes beyond any and all doubt that the conspiracy is an ongoing one.
The statute of limitations clock that some have worried might allow Brennan, Comey, et al, to escape consequences has demonstrably not yet even started.
Meanwhile, several of the named co-conspirators as well as their Democrat supporters in Congress insist that Obamagate is all nonsense cooked up between Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard. Andrew McCabe last week argued that DNI Gabbard does not understand intelligence information.
So, the idea that she would use this discussion around sourcing and intensive Russians as some sort of springboard for charges against Barack Obama or John Brennan or Jim Comey or anyone else is absurd. And she either knows it's absurd and she's doing it anyway, or the Director of National Intelligence actually doesn't understand the nuances of intelligence, which should concern a lot of Americans.
Democrat Congressman Jason Crow kept up the Democrat drumbeat that prior investigations already proved Russian Collusion in the 2016 election.
He added, “But let’s be really clear here that the Russian investigation and allegations of Russian interference into the election, have been the most examined and reexamined finding in the intelligence community history. There have been four investigations, including a bipartisan Senate investigation led under the first Trump administration and led in part by Marco Rubio. That was very, very clear on these findings.”
However, both McCabe and Crow are confounded by the reality of what came of the investigations into Russian Collusion during Trump’s first term.
They overlook the reality that Mueller’s Special Counsel probe resulted in exactly zero prosecutions for Russian collusion.
They overlook the reality that several of the prosecutions started by Mueller collapse for lack of evidence.
As much as Democrats and corporate media want people to believe that the case for Russian Collusion was a slam dunk during Trump’s first term, and that the case remains a slam dunk, the reality was always very near the polar opposite.
The evidence has always pointed towards Russian Collusion being a hoax, and the conspiracy being between the Obama Administration and the Deep State, not between Donald Trump and Russia.
Now more of the classified evidence surrounding this matter is set to be released, and it is confirms what the publicly available evidence has always shown:
Russian Collusion was a Hoax.
The Obama Administration knew it was a hoax, and lied about it anyway.
The FBI and CIA knew it was a hoax, and lied to the courts and to Congress anyway.
The Obama Administration and the Deep State lied to perpetuate the hoax into Donald Trump’s first term of office and beyond. They lied to undermine the duly elected President of the United States.
This is what Tulsi Gabbard’s first reveal proved.
This is what the second reveal confirmed.
This is what the facts and the evidence show. This is what the facts and the evidence have always shown.
The Democrats’ only response to the facts and the evidence has been that you should never trust your lying eyes. Seriously.
I say you should review the evidence for yourself—I’ve linked to it across my articles on this topic. Evaluate for yourself what is good evidence and what is sketchy evidence. Then form your own conclusion about whether or not Russians really conspired with Donald Trump to tilt the election outcome in his direction.
Trust nothing.
Verify everything.
Any criminal would cringe in dread if you were the prosecutor assigned to his case, Peter. What a tenacious bulldog you’ve been on this issue, for years! And, as usual, you’ve been proven right. I’m not surprised - your amazing abilities are consistent!
The next line in the infomercial that we all knew and laughed at, “But wait…there’s more!” was, “NOW how much would you pay!”
Oh, they’re going to PAY.