20 Comments
User's avatar
Durling Heath's avatar

The full-on collusion by the legacy media might be the most dangerous aspect of this. So many members of the legacy media have TDS, that formerly prestigious outlets now refuse to report the news. That is one of the main reasons that the Dems had to lose: the complete alignment across the executive branch, the legacy media, universities, school boards, and federal workforce was anti-democratic and very nearly entrenched.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

There is no doubt that corporate media has become the antithesis of a free and unfettered press contemplated by the First Amendment. It is rather a captive media, chained to the Democrats and bound to promote their political, social, and moral agenda.

Whether Donald Trump's muscular Presidency will manage to liberate the media and bring about a journalistic renaissance in this country remains to be seen. I'm not confident that it will.

Expand full comment
Unsteady's avatar

Brennan must know the deep state will have his back, come what may, as any lawyer worth his salt would be telling him to shut his pie hole - not go on MSNBC and defend himself.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

Certainly it seems Brennan believes he will not be either indicted or convicted.

Either that or Brennan has figured that his only hope is to somehow persuade people that he didn't lie and that Tulsi Gabbard is wrong.

While I make no predictions over whether Brennan will actually be indicted, there is little doubt in my mind that there is a strong case to be made for criminal charges and convictions here, with Brennan's name at the top of the list.

Expand full comment
Bill Beshlian's avatar

Peter please keep the analyses coming. Too bad it took all these years and Putin for the truth to be divulged about how unstable Hilary is. I could have told you 30 years ago but, I had to keep my mouth shut as part of my last life.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

I will definitely keep posting the facts and my analytical take on them.

As for Hillary—I remember the clown show she made of “Hillarycare” back in the 1990s. She was a major reason Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America” resonated with voters in the 1994 midterms.

The idea that she was some policy uber wonk and consummate political leader has always struck me as something beyond farcical.

Expand full comment
The Watchman's avatar

Not sure why they are dragging this out. Tulsi needs to get it all out there and be done with it and Bondi needs to move on it, ASAP! Unless they are doing this on purpose as a distraction for the masses to make them forget about the Epstein problem.

Expand full comment
Abigail Starke's avatar

Are we gonna see justice for Trump and actual punishment for him, etc? Where are the arrest warrants? More evidence!!

Expand full comment
Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

Brennan needs to be executed after convicted along with Obama (not that others don’t as well).

Expand full comment
John's avatar

Nothing will happen to The Chosen One, but this further tarnishes his precious legacy, which is the only thing Obama cares about. It’s worth it just to see him and his acolytes squirm.

Expand full comment
Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

We are done as a constitutional republic if Obama isn’t punished.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

I’ll be shocked if he is.

Expand full comment
Gbill7's avatar

Peter, you have brilliantly analyzed the big picture and also the minute details for many years. It’s distressing that after years of compiling hard evidence, society stills comes down to Side A vs Side Z, with the chasm between them ever widening. Where does it end? It seems as though each side is just digging in its heels, not coming together to establish the actual truth. The Leftists seem to be impervious to documented facts. Will it have to end in the violence of civil war that some pundits fear? Arggghh. Combined with other societal ills, this feels like it will not end well.

If anyone has any encouraging words today, I could sure love to hear them.

Expand full comment
Richard Brannin's avatar

I think this is historic. To have the Democrats obviously attempting to destroy an elected President with the cooperation of the CIA, FBI, and the legacy media is unprecedented and a National scandal.

I believe it goes on with the ICE violent riots. Financed by whom?

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

Government corruption, and government officials plotting against their political rivals is hardly unusual.

However, the breadth of the corruption displayed in crafting the Russian Collusion Hoax is at least staggering and may very well be without historical precedent.

That's not a good thing.

Expand full comment
Thomas F Davis's avatar

Agreed. Watergate was the nearest event, but there the tampering was done mostly by former Federal employees, not current employees (though not the cover-up). And none of that tampering involved outright lies, they were after true dirt.

It is striking how Watergate generated bipartisan condemnation, but aside from Gabbard (she was a Democrat when she started on this road) there has been no comparable bipartisanship with Russiagate. It’s another sign of how corrupt the Democrats are.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

One of most challenging aspects about these events is the Democrats' imperviousness to facts and simple reality. Engaging with a Democrat these days is literally engaging with a person in a complete psychotic break. They don't process information the way rational people do.

One thing is proven beyond any and all doubt: Democrats will not be moved by facts and evidence out of their alternate reality.

Think Plato's allegory of the cave put on blast.

Expand full comment
Thomas F Davis's avatar

IMO Gabbard sensed she was being invited to join the Inner Ring, and they never forgave her for her refusal. She is an apostate from a cult.

Expand full comment
Robert C Culwell's avatar

Thank Peter

I believe Tulsi

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

We do well to understand that belief in the narrative is not relevant here.

This is what is documented.

This is what can be proven.

This is what is factual.

No matter what people believe, this is the narrative that will endure, because this is the narrative that is grounded in facts.

Tulsi Gabbard has facts, and facts trump narrative every time.

Expand full comment