11 Comments
User's avatar
Torrance Stephens's avatar

How Can You Have Someone whose Job is to oversee Mortgage Fraud, allegedly commit Mortgage Fraud? https://shorturl.at/9MvXJ

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

During Biden’s Reign of Error, apparently quite easily.

Expand full comment
Torrance Stephens's avatar

No lie there

Expand full comment
Flippin’ Jersey's avatar

Also, there is no loophole for claiming multiple primary residences, unless governing regulations were re-written. I worked as a mortgage underwriter many moons ago and you can claim exactly one (1) primary residence. Everything else is either a vacation home or investment property which require different down payments and interest rates. Now, can she claim “I made an oopsie” on the application? Perhaps, but you signed the paperwork, there’s lots of opportunities to correct the mistake during the loan process prior to closing. If equal application of the law is a thing, she’s Cook-ed.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

I would be very surprised if there was legit reason for claiming both properties as primary residence. I leave the possibility open just to cover all possible scenarios as to how this came about.

Expand full comment
Flippin’ Jersey's avatar

I’m sure someone will claim that, but it doesn’t make it so.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

Reality is inconvenient that way

Expand full comment
Flippin’ Jersey's avatar

Option 3 would be to channel her inner Peter Gabriel: “I don’t remember, I don’t recall, I have no memory…of anything at all.”

Expand full comment
Gbill7's avatar

One of the lessons in life that EVERYONE - including the people at The NY Times - has to learn is that All Facts Matter. There’s no permanent way of escaping the consequences. Not for anyone, no matter how much they plug their ears and whine, “Nyah Nyah Nyah I can’t hear you!”.

A few months ago, I read that DOGE had uncovered that The NY Times has been receiving $40 million/year from the Biden administration, laundered through USAID as “subscriptions” for USAID employees (which came out as each “subscription” costing thousands of dollars). I assume that money has now stopped flowing to the Gray Lady. So I’m wondering, how much longer can they continue to publish? They have been losing credibility on a daily basis, which should result in many people not renewing their subscriptions. Now that they’ve lost their sugar daddy, how many months remain on their shelf life? Anyone know if they’ve got deep endowment funds or something that could prop them up? If we start to hear that certain top managers or writers are jumping ship, that should be our first clue. Peter, maybe you’ll notice some minor item about editors leaving for greener pastures. The rest of the world might be shocked - shocked I tell you - if the Times suddenly folds, but you won’t. I’m going to ko-fi you the price of a (cheap) bottle of champagne if this happens!

Expand full comment
Indrek Sarapuu's avatar

Great post!

NYT would never read All Facts Matter, as it would be anathema to their existence.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

The New York Times avoids facts the way vampires avoid sunlight and garlic.

Expand full comment