1 Comment
⭠ Return to thread

This case just emphasizes several of the problems we face with this issue. To legalize abortion we had to change the language from baby to fetus. And the legal precedent became that life was recognized at birth. However, if you murdered a woman who was pregnant, you could be charged for two murders, the mother and the fetus. Then came premature birth and late term abortion, both of which depended on whether or not the woman wanted the child, with the pro abortion side suppressing any

any information or photos of abortion procedures or the Gosnell clinic. They knew that if people saw these pictures, with the prevalence of premature birth that people would be appalled. No comes this ruling, the Plaintiffs in the suit allege that fertilized embryos are viable and therefore alive. The pro abortion people, must dismiss this case by mudding the facts, if we acknowledge that these Plaintiffs are correct and these embryos are living, then abortion goes out on its ear. Like so many of todays issues the logic must be twisted to justify the belief!

Expand full comment