5 Comments
Feb 22, 2023Liked by Peter Nayland Kust

Interesting that Google via DDG took forever and I received multiple DNS site can't be reached errors trying to like your post...

This is fabulous "My argument has always been rhetorically simple: Free Speech is a moral imperative. Our duty to ourselves and to our fellow man is not to silence any speech, but to meet objectionable speech with alternative speech, to challenge bad ideas and toxic rhetoric with good ideas and positive rhetoric." Thank you!

Expand full comment

I hope the government is found guilty for colluding with social media companies in their noxious attempts to censor what they deem to be "medical misinformation." But what will happen then? Certainly no one will go to prison as they should. At best some kind of fine? I am not optimistic that the guilty parties will receive just punishments.

Expand full comment
Feb 22, 2023Liked by Peter Nayland Kust

What about starting a suit regarding both (c)(1) and (c)(2) coupled with the government's clear intent to interfere with freedom of speech via nefarious yet willing-social media interaction? I wish I became a civil rights lawyer. I'd be poor but busy!

Expand full comment