The House of Representatives has unanimously passed S.619, Senator Josh Hawley's bill calling for the declassification of COVID intelligence held by the US government.
Whether this will shed any new light on the origins of the virus is debatable. Still, having the government disclose what it knows can only be a positive. The more information that is accessible to the public the better.
Anytime Congress does anything unanimously, you can be certain they have nothing to lose and/or something to gain. Nothing happens in this government without a purpose that either makes things worse for us or better for them. Something is fishy, as always.
That's my first thought as well. Do they really want to go down a path that might include a genuine "search for the truth" on the origins of this virus? Having Redfield testify showed the danger of this. He said he now knows there were people being infected in "September" 2019. This flies in the face of the CDC's comments from a May 29, 2020 press conference when he and other CDC officials said flatly that there was no evidence of infections in America until "late January" 2020. Wherever the virus originated if people were infecting and spreading virus in September, the virus would have spread all over the world by at least November. I think they are trying to restrict the hypothesis to spread starting in Wuhan in November or December and almost certainly originating from the WIV. Maybe this was the source of "case zero" in the world, but that "case zero" wasn't infected in November or December 2019. My theory is, for some reason, officials are intentionally concealing early cases outside of China.
That the virus first emerged in Wuhan is fairly well established by the epidemiological evidence. Contrary to popular belief there is no "cryptic transmission" of infectious respiratory pathogens, so if it's spreading people are getting sick, and people got sick first in Wuhan.
Exactly when it emerged is a different question. The official Chinese line is it emerged in late December, largely capitalizing on the fact that's when the world first noticed.
What China has not admitted and still needs to account for are the very specific actions they took to spread the virus and weaponize the pandemic.
What Fauci, et al, need to acknowledge is the degree to which they enabled and facilitated the activities of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
There is far more "epidemiological evidence" that the virus was spreading in America in November and December than in Wuhan. That is, if one counts positive antibody results (and obvious Covid symptoms) as "evidence" of Covid.
There were no outbreaks of influenza like illness of any note before late December, and even the possible early wave of COVID in Los Angeles was written off at the time as seasonal flu.
Also, given the international travel between Wuhan and the US, scattered instances of antibodies are not nearly as dispositive as some are wont to believe.
Unanimmously!
Well, that's one for the books.
I guess it means they will lie in unison.
We already know the truth, and it's long past time for Congress to catch up with the crime that has been perpetrated against humanity:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/b3a20073d76f
Whether they do, and whether they disclose the truth to the world, is another matter entirely.
However, we can continue to spread whatever truth we have uncovered on our own:
> Please share David Martin's video link (or this "red pill" library link above) far and wide.
Anytime Congress does anything unanimously, you can be certain they have nothing to lose and/or something to gain. Nothing happens in this government without a purpose that either makes things worse for us or better for them. Something is fishy, as always.
That's my first thought as well. Do they really want to go down a path that might include a genuine "search for the truth" on the origins of this virus? Having Redfield testify showed the danger of this. He said he now knows there were people being infected in "September" 2019. This flies in the face of the CDC's comments from a May 29, 2020 press conference when he and other CDC officials said flatly that there was no evidence of infections in America until "late January" 2020. Wherever the virus originated if people were infecting and spreading virus in September, the virus would have spread all over the world by at least November. I think they are trying to restrict the hypothesis to spread starting in Wuhan in November or December and almost certainly originating from the WIV. Maybe this was the source of "case zero" in the world, but that "case zero" wasn't infected in November or December 2019. My theory is, for some reason, officials are intentionally concealing early cases outside of China.
That the virus first emerged in Wuhan is fairly well established by the epidemiological evidence. Contrary to popular belief there is no "cryptic transmission" of infectious respiratory pathogens, so if it's spreading people are getting sick, and people got sick first in Wuhan.
Exactly when it emerged is a different question. The official Chinese line is it emerged in late December, largely capitalizing on the fact that's when the world first noticed.
What China has not admitted and still needs to account for are the very specific actions they took to spread the virus and weaponize the pandemic.
What Fauci, et al, need to acknowledge is the degree to which they enabled and facilitated the activities of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
There are no good guys here.
There is far more "epidemiological evidence" that the virus was spreading in America in November and December than in Wuhan. That is, if one counts positive antibody results (and obvious Covid symptoms) as "evidence" of Covid.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/early-spread-evidence-in-one-document
There were no outbreaks of influenza like illness of any note before late December, and even the possible early wave of COVID in Los Angeles was written off at the time as seasonal flu.
Also, given the international travel between Wuhan and the US, scattered instances of antibodies are not nearly as dispositive as some are wont to believe.