Not exactly. More like the safe harbor provisions of Section 230 get in the way of the Democrats imposing even greater censorship regimes. You can't get to a China-style system of censorship and still give Big Tech Social Media blanket immunity. Step one towards that process is the removal of Section 230.
Not exactly. More like the safe harbor provisions of Section 230 get in the way of the Democrats imposing even greater censorship regimes. You can't get to a China-style system of censorship and still give Big Tech Social Media blanket immunity. Step one towards that process is the removal of Section 230.
That step is one that the totalitarians and the libertarians likely would have in common. The difference is the libertarians would be more likely to stop there, while the totalitarians would replace Section 230 with something far worse.
Not exactly. More like the safe harbor provisions of Section 230 get in the way of the Democrats imposing even greater censorship regimes. You can't get to a China-style system of censorship and still give Big Tech Social Media blanket immunity. Step one towards that process is the removal of Section 230.
That step is one that the totalitarians and the libertarians likely would have in common. The difference is the libertarians would be more likely to stop there, while the totalitarians would replace Section 230 with something far worse.
And Dementia Joe has already hinted as such.