"While Musk’s tweet is not at all the proof of massive fraud that the Twitterverse has made it out to be, it is very much an indication of the sort of recordkeeping problems that facilitate fraud."
You can be SURE that if fraud is facilitated that it is indeed taking place.
"While Musk’s tweet is not at all the proof of massive fraud that the Twitterverse has made it out to be, it is very much an indication of the sort of recordkeeping problems that facilitate fraud."
You can be SURE that if fraud is facilitated that it is indeed taking place.
The probability is extremely high. There is no question about that.
But all probabilities less than one mean that something “may” be taking place.
Proof means something undeniably “is” taking place.
Thus Musk’s tweets are not proof of fraud, but proof that the bureaucracy needs the audit equivalent of a colonoscopy to ascertain what fraud, how much fraud, and whom should be held liable for the fraud.
"While Musk’s tweet is not at all the proof of massive fraud that the Twitterverse has made it out to be, it is very much an indication of the sort of recordkeeping problems that facilitate fraud."
You can be SURE that if fraud is facilitated that it is indeed taking place.
The probability is extremely high. There is no question about that.
But all probabilities less than one mean that something “may” be taking place.
Proof means something undeniably “is” taking place.
Thus Musk’s tweets are not proof of fraud, but proof that the bureaucracy needs the audit equivalent of a colonoscopy to ascertain what fraud, how much fraud, and whom should be held liable for the fraud.