Until now, COVID-19 vaccines have targeted the original coronavirus strain, even as wildly different mutants emerged. The new U.S. boosters are combination, or "bivalent," shots. They contain half that original vaccine recipe and half protection against the newest omicron versions, BA.4 and BA.5, that are considered the most contagious yet.
These new shots have not been tested at all on humans, but the FDA is approving them anyway.
You have a point, long term. For preparations where I live, the local communities in GA can implement masking mandates (which will make shopping for preparations more difficult).
While there is no real debate on the efficacy of universal masking (there is no efficacy at all), as a purely tactical consideration I would not make the face mask the hill to die on.
Do what you need to do to prepare adequately for the gathering storm. Mask mandates are survivable. Lack of preparation may not be so kind.
I wore a mask one time and I didn't feel good after five minutes. Will work on it to try to avoid it as that policy will be (and has been) a gateway for the other ones.
I just keep shaking my head. WHAT are these people thinking? They are NOT thinking! The death toll on this will so vastly overshadow/overtake the death toll from abortion - this should be the. most. important. issue. of. everyones' campaigns. Period.
Still, the death toll from an untested mRNA shot is unacceptably high.
Are people thinking? Some are, many are not. The "experts" certainly are not thinking...and Faucism is such a cerebral rot they may be incapable of thinking.
My dearest hope for this Substack (and the many other excellent ones that touch on these topics) is that people will read, go "Hmmmmm" and start the process of activating their own little gray cells. A fair number are already there (and more than a few do an excellent job of keeping me on my toes!), but I'm greedy--I always want more.
The Faucists fear a population of independent thinkers who weigh facts and evidences for themselves, and to Hell with "experts" and their "opinions."
It would be a grave mistake to conflate intention with intelligence.
There's no doubt that everything the FDA has done is intentional. However, the way "experts" like Fauci and Walensky have had to repeatedly rewrite their own narrative is a very strong indication that things have not turned out as they expected.
Whether we're looking at Fauci's serial prevarications on NIH funding for gain-of-function research in Wuhan, or Walensky's repeated redefinition of what the inoculations were meant to accomplish, by far the majority of their narrative efforts have been defensive.
At every turn, the "experts" have shown surprise and even confusion over the outcomes from the mRNA inoculation technology.
They are unquestionably malevolent. What is far from certain is the degree to which they are masters of puppets.
Agreed that things did not turn out as they expected, but much of that is because they NEVER expected Trump to win the Presidency. They expected Hillary to win - and then everything would roll out as planned, no pushback from Executive Branch. When Trump won, they waited until the last year of Trump's term. Perhaps the only way to make the vacx NOT mandatory was for Trump to "rush" it through so it would have to be labeled experimental. How does that sound? It's the lesser of two evils. But had these vacxs been mandatory, wouldn't the death count be even more astronomical?
PS: I think the only "confusion" and "surprise" the "experts" have shown is what is the best way to EFFECTIVELY LIE to us about the outcomes of the mRNA inoculation technology.
PPS: Also, while I am certain they are puppets, and not the ultimate masters, they are not sock puppets. They had a choice to participate in this world-wide holocaust, and that choice makes them malevolent AND culpable.
There is no good way to extrapolate what might have happened had the inoculation mandates been forced into law. Suffice it to say the outcome would have been "not good".
Would people have accepted the Mark of The Beast and thus placed their lives at risk? That is possible.
Would people have rebelled, and thus ignited a civil war? That, too, is possible.
I strive to be a realist. I look at what is, not what might have been. I extrapolate from the data at hand, as best as I can apprehend it. I rarely speculate on the motives of others--I'm far more interested in what they are doing and what they are preparing to do than I am why they are doing it. Actions have consequences, intentions not so much.
And I am mindful of the three boxes Frederick Douglass noted as holding man's inalienable rights: The ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box. I pray the first two are sufficient because I damn sure do not want to have to resort to the third.
Are we going along with the Douglas Adams hypothesis that laboratory mice are really the most intelligent species on the Earth, being the ones who organized its creation as an organic supercomputer to determine why the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything was 42?
The scale of this hysteria is historic.
If it were a Hollywood script the scale of the hysteria would be hysterical..
As it's reality and not Hollyweird, it's merely horrifying.
Indeed. At this point it IS horrifying. Chilling. Bourla just Tweeted the new 'vaccine' will 'prevent' Covid in people 12 and up. Horrifying.
A lot. Concerned about more masking policies coming back because of all the reactions...
Masking policies are the least of the worries.
There are still cadres of "experts" who actually ADMIRE Xi Jinping's suicidal Zero COVID strategy.
(Yet another reason "expert" should be interpreted as wokespeak for "blithering idiot").
You have a point, long term. For preparations where I live, the local communities in GA can implement masking mandates (which will make shopping for preparations more difficult).
While there is no real debate on the efficacy of universal masking (there is no efficacy at all), as a purely tactical consideration I would not make the face mask the hill to die on.
Do what you need to do to prepare adequately for the gathering storm. Mask mandates are survivable. Lack of preparation may not be so kind.
I wore a mask one time and I didn't feel good after five minutes. Will work on it to try to avoid it as that policy will be (and has been) a gateway for the other ones.
At this point, that gateway has already been thrown wide open. Which is part of the problem we face in the current situation.
I just keep shaking my head. WHAT are these people thinking? They are NOT thinking! The death toll on this will so vastly overshadow/overtake the death toll from abortion - this should be the. most. important. issue. of. everyones' campaigns. Period.
The death toll from abortion is pretty damn high.
Still, the death toll from an untested mRNA shot is unacceptably high.
Are people thinking? Some are, many are not. The "experts" certainly are not thinking...and Faucism is such a cerebral rot they may be incapable of thinking.
My dearest hope for this Substack (and the many other excellent ones that touch on these topics) is that people will read, go "Hmmmmm" and start the process of activating their own little gray cells. A fair number are already there (and more than a few do an excellent job of keeping me on my toes!), but I'm greedy--I always want more.
The Faucists fear a population of independent thinkers who weigh facts and evidences for themselves, and to Hell with "experts" and their "opinions."
Me, I crave exactly that population.
Or maybe the 'experts' are thinking. At this point I believe it's intentional.
Agreed. Intentional.
Peter Kust - there is NO WAY the "experts" are certainly not thinking, as you put it. This has to be intentional.
It would be a grave mistake to conflate intention with intelligence.
There's no doubt that everything the FDA has done is intentional. However, the way "experts" like Fauci and Walensky have had to repeatedly rewrite their own narrative is a very strong indication that things have not turned out as they expected.
Whether we're looking at Fauci's serial prevarications on NIH funding for gain-of-function research in Wuhan, or Walensky's repeated redefinition of what the inoculations were meant to accomplish, by far the majority of their narrative efforts have been defensive.
At every turn, the "experts" have shown surprise and even confusion over the outcomes from the mRNA inoculation technology.
They are unquestionably malevolent. What is far from certain is the degree to which they are masters of puppets.
Agreed that things did not turn out as they expected, but much of that is because they NEVER expected Trump to win the Presidency. They expected Hillary to win - and then everything would roll out as planned, no pushback from Executive Branch. When Trump won, they waited until the last year of Trump's term. Perhaps the only way to make the vacx NOT mandatory was for Trump to "rush" it through so it would have to be labeled experimental. How does that sound? It's the lesser of two evils. But had these vacxs been mandatory, wouldn't the death count be even more astronomical?
PS: I think the only "confusion" and "surprise" the "experts" have shown is what is the best way to EFFECTIVELY LIE to us about the outcomes of the mRNA inoculation technology.
PPS: Also, while I am certain they are puppets, and not the ultimate masters, they are not sock puppets. They had a choice to participate in this world-wide holocaust, and that choice makes them malevolent AND culpable.
There is no good way to extrapolate what might have happened had the inoculation mandates been forced into law. Suffice it to say the outcome would have been "not good".
Would people have accepted the Mark of The Beast and thus placed their lives at risk? That is possible.
Would people have rebelled, and thus ignited a civil war? That, too, is possible.
I strive to be a realist. I look at what is, not what might have been. I extrapolate from the data at hand, as best as I can apprehend it. I rarely speculate on the motives of others--I'm far more interested in what they are doing and what they are preparing to do than I am why they are doing it. Actions have consequences, intentions not so much.
And I am mindful of the three boxes Frederick Douglass noted as holding man's inalienable rights: The ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box. I pray the first two are sufficient because I damn sure do not want to have to resort to the third.
The mice may find that offensive.
Are we going along with the Douglas Adams hypothesis that laboratory mice are really the most intelligent species on the Earth, being the ones who organized its creation as an organic supercomputer to determine why the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything was 42?
I guess most people (vaxxed) have shown that they don't care about testing and are willing to be the test subjects...
If they only knew. . .
I wonder if this is the time for the real “operation warp speed”, as in warp speed depopulation.