Newsom is a politician, passing the buck. And the Left never seems to understand cause and effect; can’t comprehend that actions have consequences.
In this case, much of the problem is that unlimited amounts of fentanyl easily comes across the border. It is so addictive that people can’t muster the desire to get off it and get their life …
Newsom is a politician, passing the buck. And the Left never seems to understand cause and effect; can’t comprehend that actions have consequences.
In this case, much of the problem is that unlimited amounts of fentanyl easily comes across the border. It is so addictive that people can’t muster the desire to get off it and get their life functioning again.
In earlier times in America, a homeowner could take in borders. The homeowners were fully within their legal rights to specify conditions such as no drinking, no sex, no swearing,etc. A widow taking in borders could CHOOSE her borders, on her own assessment of the person’s moral stature. Today, a homeowner is hampered by government bureaucracies having full control, supposedly so that there is no ‘discrimination’. Sorry, but if I’m taking in a stranger, I have to choose on the basis of what I deem safe!
In any case, the situation is a mess.
Peter, I just made a donation to your ministry in memory of an old friend who died homeless thirteen years ago today. He was a good soul, but his mind and nervous system were very damaged from alcoholism. I wish I had known that he became homeless as a result, but that’s not a thing that a person of dignity advertises to his friends.
I hope that you can help a homeless person with this (admittedly small) donation, in memory of Dan. Thanks!
Homelessness is a complex issue that often has deep roots in addiction, mental health struggles, lack of affordable housing, and more.
Your point about the role of government in regulating the ability of homeowners to take in borders is thought-provoking. While the intent may have been to prevent discrimination, it has potentially limited the capacity of some homeowners to offer help to those in need, based on their personal assessment of a person's character and potential fit with their household.
Obdachlose Erwachsene die aus beruflichen Gründen in finanzielle Not geraten und die Miete nicht mehr bezahlen können ist schlimm aber niemand redet über die mehr als 100.000 Kinder die in den USA in die Obdachlosigkeit landen.
Newsom is a politician, passing the buck. And the Left never seems to understand cause and effect; can’t comprehend that actions have consequences.
In this case, much of the problem is that unlimited amounts of fentanyl easily comes across the border. It is so addictive that people can’t muster the desire to get off it and get their life functioning again.
In earlier times in America, a homeowner could take in borders. The homeowners were fully within their legal rights to specify conditions such as no drinking, no sex, no swearing,etc. A widow taking in borders could CHOOSE her borders, on her own assessment of the person’s moral stature. Today, a homeowner is hampered by government bureaucracies having full control, supposedly so that there is no ‘discrimination’. Sorry, but if I’m taking in a stranger, I have to choose on the basis of what I deem safe!
In any case, the situation is a mess.
Peter, I just made a donation to your ministry in memory of an old friend who died homeless thirteen years ago today. He was a good soul, but his mind and nervous system were very damaged from alcoholism. I wish I had known that he became homeless as a result, but that’s not a thing that a person of dignity advertises to his friends.
I hope that you can help a homeless person with this (admittedly small) donation, in memory of Dan. Thanks!
Homelessness is a complex issue that often has deep roots in addiction, mental health struggles, lack of affordable housing, and more.
Your point about the role of government in regulating the ability of homeowners to take in borders is thought-provoking. While the intent may have been to prevent discrimination, it has potentially limited the capacity of some homeowners to offer help to those in need, based on their personal assessment of a person's character and potential fit with their household.
I agree, fentanyl is probably one of the major problems here. Newsom should worry about "Fixing the crime, instead of cleaning the grime"!!!!!!!
Obdachlose Erwachsene die aus beruflichen Gründen in finanzielle Not geraten und die Miete nicht mehr bezahlen können ist schlimm aber niemand redet über die mehr als 100.000 Kinder die in den USA in die Obdachlosigkeit landen.