The "clump of cells" argument is particularly dangerous because the same description may be fairly applied to the adult human without modification or exception.
The sublime inference behind that argument is that one person is equipped to adjudicate the humanity of another. That one person is competent to adjudicate the personhood of anoth…
The "clump of cells" argument is particularly dangerous because the same description may be fairly applied to the adult human without modification or exception.
The sublime inference behind that argument is that one person is equipped to adjudicate the humanity of another. That one person is competent to adjudicate the personhood of another.
I cannot imagine a more terrifying prospect than someone else deciding whether or not I am even human.
The "clump of cells" argument is particularly dangerous because the same description may be fairly applied to the adult human without modification or exception.
The sublime inference behind that argument is that one person is equipped to adjudicate the humanity of another. That one person is competent to adjudicate the personhood of another.
I cannot imagine a more terrifying prospect than someone else deciding whether or not I am even human.
Better pray that sort of person isn't a sociopath or psychopath. Or just plain stupid.
You are here.
VP cackle is stupid like a fox
She a hoe
namaste