Can OCD exist at the corporate level? This sound exactly like what happens in my head I know what I want to is not only not necessary it’s not going to fix anything. But still do it. Retracing letters doesn’t make them better and eventually it ends up putting holes in the paper. Taking an hour to fold a polyester fitted sheet doesn’t make it fit better or make it Giza cotton. OCD creates viruses (problems) to find solutions that don’t really have to exist.
Can OCD exist as a corporate phenomenon? Strictly speaking, no. But corporate groupthink is such a stubborn phenomenon one does have to wonder sometimes!
Just last week, an epidemiologist from the University of Toronto (where else? Well, McGill) was telling people to take Paxlovid if they're over 60. It prevents hospitalizations he claimed.
Empirical evidence is never a matter of belief. Calling viruses "imaginary" requires a rejection of the data which is quite at odds with logical thinking.
Can OCD exist at the corporate level? This sound exactly like what happens in my head I know what I want to is not only not necessary it’s not going to fix anything. But still do it. Retracing letters doesn’t make them better and eventually it ends up putting holes in the paper. Taking an hour to fold a polyester fitted sheet doesn’t make it fit better or make it Giza cotton. OCD creates viruses (problems) to find solutions that don’t really have to exist.
Can OCD exist as a corporate phenomenon? Strictly speaking, no. But corporate groupthink is such a stubborn phenomenon one does have to wonder sometimes!
Just last week, an epidemiologist from the University of Toronto (where else? Well, McGill) was telling people to take Paxlovid if they're over 60. It prevents hospitalizations he claimed.
Amazing, huh?
Sadly, no, it's not amazing. Appalling, but no longer amazing.
Empirical evidence is never a matter of belief. Calling viruses "imaginary" requires a rejection of the data which is quite at odds with logical thinking.
Spam is never an argument. Not is particularly welcome.
Here ends this discussion.