Your analysis is solid. Given that Harris wasn’t a part of the political landscape when the Ukraine dealings took place, it seems unlikely that she’d be directly implicated. However, as you point out, her proximity to the current administration might cast some suspicion on her, particularly if it comes to light that she’s privy to Biden’…
Your analysis is solid. Given that Harris wasn’t a part of the political landscape when the Ukraine dealings took place, it seems unlikely that she’d be directly implicated. However, as you point out, her proximity to the current administration might cast some suspicion on her, particularly if it comes to light that she’s privy to Biden’s efforts to hinder the impeachment investigation.
Even if Harris isn’t directly implicated, this whole affair could tarnish her already shady reputation by association. It’s a classic example of the old adage: “guilt by association.”
Your analysis is solid. Given that Harris wasn’t a part of the political landscape when the Ukraine dealings took place, it seems unlikely that she’d be directly implicated. However, as you point out, her proximity to the current administration might cast some suspicion on her, particularly if it comes to light that she’s privy to Biden’s efforts to hinder the impeachment investigation.
Even if Harris isn’t directly implicated, this whole affair could tarnish her already shady reputation by association. It’s a classic example of the old adage: “guilt by association.”