That's a fascinating perspective! 🤔 While it might be a long shot for Kennedy to win, supporting him could indeed send a powerful message to the “uniparty” establishment. By showing that there is a segment of the population that rejects the bipartisan status quo, you might indeed influence their policies and staffing decisions.
That's a fascinating perspective! 🤔 While it might be a long shot for Kennedy to win, supporting him could indeed send a powerful message to the “uniparty” establishment. By showing that there is a segment of the population that rejects the bipartisan status quo, you might indeed influence their policies and staffing decisions.
The current political climate is ripe for upheaval, and your vote for Kennedy could be seen as a symbolic protest against the two-party system.
Symbolic protest, maybe, but I'm thinking that either candidate, or their handlers, would observe that they could solidify support by including RFKJ in their administration. Which might actually be true, altho it's still a uniparty.
You're right that incorporating RFK Jr. into their administrations could indeed be a smart political move for either candidate. It sends a message to the electorate that they are open to fresh perspectives, all while potentially drawing support from Kennedy's loyalists.
In this scenario, it would be interesting to see how RFK Jr. would leverage his position. Would he prioritize implementing his policies from within the system, or would he use the platform to continue challenging the uniparty and advocating for his vision?
That's a fascinating perspective! 🤔 While it might be a long shot for Kennedy to win, supporting him could indeed send a powerful message to the “uniparty” establishment. By showing that there is a segment of the population that rejects the bipartisan status quo, you might indeed influence their policies and staffing decisions.
The current political climate is ripe for upheaval, and your vote for Kennedy could be seen as a symbolic protest against the two-party system.
Symbolic protest, maybe, but I'm thinking that either candidate, or their handlers, would observe that they could solidify support by including RFKJ in their administration. Which might actually be true, altho it's still a uniparty.
You're right that incorporating RFK Jr. into their administrations could indeed be a smart political move for either candidate. It sends a message to the electorate that they are open to fresh perspectives, all while potentially drawing support from Kennedy's loyalists.
In this scenario, it would be interesting to see how RFK Jr. would leverage his position. Would he prioritize implementing his policies from within the system, or would he use the platform to continue challenging the uniparty and advocating for his vision?