This point is rock solid. It definitely highlights the shameless hypocrisy and immorality of these would-be censors in supporting free speech of those who are literally inciting violence.
This point is rock solid. It definitely highlights the shameless hypocrisy and immorality of these would-be censors in supporting free speech of those who are literally inciting violence.
The one thing I will point out is that those who have tried to censor and silence those on the political right are NOT supporting "free speech". That's the problem.
They are supporting terroristic violence. The evidence proves that in abundance.
No one should ever conflate the Columbia University demonstrations with any sort of "speech". Violence is not speech, and what transpired at Columbia (and at Harvard and at too many other college campuses around the country) was violence.
There is no Constitutional protection for terroristic violence.
This point is rock solid. It definitely highlights the shameless hypocrisy and immorality of these would-be censors in supporting free speech of those who are literally inciting violence.
The one thing I will point out is that those who have tried to censor and silence those on the political right are NOT supporting "free speech". That's the problem.
They are supporting terroristic violence. The evidence proves that in abundance.
No one should ever conflate the Columbia University demonstrations with any sort of "speech". Violence is not speech, and what transpired at Columbia (and at Harvard and at too many other college campuses around the country) was violence.
There is no Constitutional protection for terroristic violence.