To say that the corporate media is having a field day with the run-up to Donald Trump’s likely arraignment on Tuesday in a Manhattan courtroom, where charges are being preferred by the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, is an understatement.
The general rule of thumb is that the more persecution an individual is facing in the "press" and now the "courts" is proportional to the potential value they offer toward creating peace and prosperity in this country.
There is certainly an inverse variation between the magnitude of indignity and outrage among Democrats and wokesters and the actual severity of the offense.
Essentially, Bragg indicted Trump for being Donald Trump.
We should be mandated to wear neck braces rather than masks.
A comment just now on AB's stack echoed your sentiment:
Joe Writes Joe’s Newsletter
"LOL - a corrupt local prosecutor in NYC decides to charge a former President and current front-runner for the Republican nomination for an underlying federal crime (which has never been adjudicated by Federal Authorities) and Alex has some "qualms". This is a watershed moment in American history and Alex thinks it's water off the ducks back. No big deal right?"
I'm willing to withhold final judgement until Bragg makes his case. If he has a solid case then let justice be done.
However, he has a very tall hill to climb to make a case that justifies all the melodrama we've seen this far. To borrow from James Comey, "no reasonable prosecutor would bring this case".
If he (Bragg) had a track record of holding lawbreakers feet to the fire then it's more plausible that we could presume he could have valid charges to press against Trump. There is a very small chance he could have dug something up. . . Likely it's more Russia Russia Russia-type claims. Will see.. .
The general rule of thumb is that the more persecution an individual is facing in the "press" and now the "courts" is proportional to the potential value they offer toward creating peace and prosperity in this country.
There is certainly an inverse variation between the magnitude of indignity and outrage among Democrats and wokesters and the actual severity of the offense.
Essentially, Bragg indicted Trump for being Donald Trump.
We should be mandated to wear neck braces rather than masks.
A comment just now on AB's stack echoed your sentiment:
Joe Writes Joe’s Newsletter
"LOL - a corrupt local prosecutor in NYC decides to charge a former President and current front-runner for the Republican nomination for an underlying federal crime (which has never been adjudicated by Federal Authorities) and Alex has some "qualms". This is a watershed moment in American history and Alex thinks it's water off the ducks back. No big deal right?"
I'm willing to withhold final judgement until Bragg makes his case. If he has a solid case then let justice be done.
However, he has a very tall hill to climb to make a case that justifies all the melodrama we've seen this far. To borrow from James Comey, "no reasonable prosecutor would bring this case".
If he (Bragg) had a track record of holding lawbreakers feet to the fire then it's more plausible that we could presume he could have valid charges to press against Trump. There is a very small chance he could have dug something up. . . Likely it's more Russia Russia Russia-type claims. Will see.. .