Rule number one of citing primary research to prove a thesis: always read the source material first and be sure that it actually supports your argument. According to a meta review conducted by the Epoch Times of sources cited and linked by the FDA to bolster their Faucist claim that Ivermectin is ineffective against COVID-19, the “experts” at the FDA failed to observe this essential rule (also known as “doing your homework”).
Perhaps they wanted to get their info out at warp speed and that is why they didn't read the source material' Linking today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
I believe Merck had the original patent on IVM but that timed out. Now they want to dis their own past successful money maker and well working treatment and come up with one that is increasingly showing might be causing more viral mutations/varients. I read something on that yesterday on substack . Very clear that is happening.
More than fraudulent. It's malfeasance.
Perhaps they wanted to get their info out at warp speed and that is why they didn't read the source material' Linking today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
Quick question: what's the difference between "Faucist" and "fraudulent?"
I believe Merck had the original patent on IVM but that timed out. Now they want to dis their own past successful money maker and well working treatment and come up with one that is increasingly showing might be causing more viral mutations/varients. I read something on that yesterday on substack . Very clear that is happening.