As long as the "anti-vax" smear is potent, gov't. will use it to push dangerous drugs into the veins of hapless citizens, for reasons of incompetence, graft, or just to kill people. All they have to do is call it a "vaccine".
And then if they feel like it, just go back and change the definition to whatever they feel like.
As long as the "anti-vax" smear is potent, gov't. will use it to push dangerous drugs into the veins of hapless citizens, for reasons of incompetence, graft, or just to kill people. All they have to do is call it a "vaccine".
And then if they feel like it, just go back and change the definition to whatever they feel like.
And this is also related to the "self spreading" vaccine study which removes all consent, informed or otherwise.
Complacency is always a greater danger--and therefore a greater sin--than compliance.
We must never stop pushing back against the hateful ad hominem of "anti-vaxx" as well as the Faucist scientific bastardy behind it. Individual critical thinking is always the bane of authoritarians everywhere, pharmaceutical and otherwise.
There may be a sliding scale of danger in no particular order: fanaticism, complacency, compliance, and just sheer willful ignorance. In the COVID era, these varying degrees all coalesced in a hurry.
Which is how you get venomous hatred (not a Brian Ardis reference!) directed towards the control group who just did their research.
The complacent take a rocket ride to fanatical because they just can't bear to admit that they got played. That they were lied to, and they bought the lie.
This is what Dr. Byram Bridle was discussing with Kirsch. People think the unjabbed are going to kill them. It's crazy and it all rests on not being "anti-vax" in their mind. All the old definitions that it conjures up.
As long as the "anti-vax" smear is potent, gov't. will use it to push dangerous drugs into the veins of hapless citizens, for reasons of incompetence, graft, or just to kill people. All they have to do is call it a "vaccine".
And then if they feel like it, just go back and change the definition to whatever they feel like.
And this is also related to the "self spreading" vaccine study which removes all consent, informed or otherwise.
Complacency is always a greater danger--and therefore a greater sin--than compliance.
We must never stop pushing back against the hateful ad hominem of "anti-vaxx" as well as the Faucist scientific bastardy behind it. Individual critical thinking is always the bane of authoritarians everywhere, pharmaceutical and otherwise.
There may be a sliding scale of danger in no particular order: fanaticism, complacency, compliance, and just sheer willful ignorance. In the COVID era, these varying degrees all coalesced in a hurry.
Which is how you get venomous hatred (not a Brian Ardis reference!) directed towards the control group who just did their research.
The complacent take a rocket ride to fanatical because they just can't bear to admit that they got played. That they were lied to, and they bought the lie.
This is what Dr. Byram Bridle was discussing with Kirsch. People think the unjabbed are going to kill them. It's crazy and it all rests on not being "anti-vax" in their mind. All the old definitions that it conjures up.
It's a pattern recognition error of sorts.
I like that sliding scale idea. Summarizes the situation nicely.