Yet WSJ Still Backs The Shots In General
thanks for this post, I read a couple different papers, when i saw Finley's opinion piece in the WSJ on 1/1/23 "Are Vaccines Fueling Covid Variants?" I gasped out loud, I really didn't expect a major paper to shift. I wonder where this is going, if it indicates a return to more reasonable discussions which include weighing the pros and cons in medical decisions... you know, in the way we used to.
As long as there is breath, there is hope!
WSJ is part of the Trusted News Initiative so I'd be surprised ( and encouraged) if they broke ranks. https://www.bbc.com/beyondfakenews/trusted-news-initiative/
I picked up on the same sentences, Peter. She had me ... until her next-to-last sentence, which shows that she still thinks vaccines are the answer. We just need better ones. Of course, nobody needs any Covid vaccine.
The editorial side of the WSJ is distinct from the "news" side ... and the news side should definitely not be trusted. I've tried for two years to get a news reporter to follow-up on all my copious evidence of "early spread." For a while, I thought one reporter was going to do just this. I sent her summaries of all my research and some of my own articles. She even interviewed Brandie McCain, who had Covid in December 2019 (and has tested positive for antibodies THREE times). In an email, she said the interview went "great." But, still, no story ever appeared and now she no longer responds to my emails.
So "early spread" evidence is off-limits to this news organization. I strongly suspect she was told by her bosses to drop this line of inquiry and investigation.
This is more evidence showing how deep the conspiracy goes. It's more evidence that shows the "watchdog" press is completely captured.
This said, it's a plus that we get a few op-ed pieces that are moving the needle a little.
Two notes on terminlogy: (1) The term "vaccine" has been shifted throughout the covid period from its actual definition, presumably to encourage public acceptnce. Vaccines put killed or safely-altered disease (or other problematic agent) material into the body to illicit an immune response. mRNA is, by definition, a genetic message. (this makes recipients genetically modified organisms, GMO's.) (2) The term "inoculation" refers to the situation in #1 above. Recipients of the Covid vaccine were not inoculated (with a disease agent) but injected with an RNA instruction.
It’s progress. It’s more cracks in the dam. The Truth will out!