Strictly speaking, I doubt the Hamas attack can be called a "false flag". Hamas has been at war with Israel literally for decades. They have been the governing power in Gaza for decades. They have been supported by Iran for decades.
That being said, we should not overlook the potential for other players outside the Middle East working their own agendas through Hamas. I touch on a bit of this in tomorrow's article.
Even in the days when Rome was just a rising Republic in Italy there were influences from outside. Alliances and agendas have always been primary tools of statecraft, and they always will be.
There is far less that is new than I suspect even Sasha or Charles realize.
Why haven't the Powers that Be come after Substack yet?
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/what-i-learned-in-the-past-week?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
“apocalypse maybe” and that means maybe if we let them scam us.
If you read my article "False Flag" you know what I mean.
I did read it and I think I know what you mean.
Strictly speaking, I doubt the Hamas attack can be called a "false flag". Hamas has been at war with Israel literally for decades. They have been the governing power in Gaza for decades. They have been supported by Iran for decades.
That being said, we should not overlook the potential for other players outside the Middle East working their own agendas through Hamas. I touch on a bit of this in tomorrow's article.
Very good!
I will look forward to reading it.
For it is rare that a single country or state has input on anything. Sasha Latypova and Charles Wright have proven this to be so.
It's not rare....it's nonexistent.
Even in the days when Rome was just a rising Republic in Italy there were influences from outside. Alliances and agendas have always been primary tools of statecraft, and they always will be.
There is far less that is new than I suspect even Sasha or Charles realize.
Excellent.