50 Comments
тна Return to thread

Glibness is one thing. Glibness about bad behavior is sociopathy.

More than a few bioethicists have raised cogent arguments against GoF experiments. Making new pathogens to study old pathogens is just not a wise idea. Yet Pfizer confirmed what JW said: they are making new pathogens to study old pathogens.

Which makes the glibness a cause for more than a little concern.

Expand full comment

This guy is not a high level decision maker, and if he had ethical standards, he'd be collecting a check elsewhere.

I'm baffled that we would expect someone in his position not to be glib. "Should" vs reality.

Expand full comment

He's a part of Pfizer and therefore a reflection of their culture.

Maybe others expect them not to be glib, but my concern is the seeming unethical behavior about which they are being glib.

Expand full comment

"He's [Dr. Jordon Walker] a part of Pfizer"

Has this been established? To this day, I'm still unsure if a) he worked for Pfizer and b) if so, in what specific role(s) and job title(s):

https://twitter.com/aronro/status/1618823095397285889

Yes, if he didn't, one might expect Pfizer to note that in any statements. But again, if he did, it's not at all clear he had Director-level responsibilities for mRNA tech.

Expand full comment

Yes, it has been established that he was a mid level manager at Pfizer.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Peter! Any good cite you came across for that, that you can share?

Expand full comment