If they do exist, what is their function in the body? The "vast amount of research" you refer to are simply the speculative theories of mainstream virologists. Appealing to their authority does not make it fact.
I invite everyone reading this to see what Jon Rappoport had to say on this subject during the very early days of the so-calle…
If they do exist, what is their function in the body? The "vast amount of research" you refer to are simply the speculative theories of mainstream virologists. Appealing to their authority does not make it fact.
I invite everyone reading this to see what Jon Rappoport had to say on this subject during the very early days of the so-called pandemic.
Damn! Will the Zombie Virus Apocalypse never come?
I write this piece for those who ordinarily have their heads on straight, when it comes to understanding the basics of HEALTH---but now, because of the “coronavirus epidemic,” are drifting back into the medical model: FIXATION ON GERMS.
A correct reading of suppressed medical history reveals that the hypothesis of “one disease, one germ” is a modern con, moving down a blind alley at midnight. And when you add “one vaccine” to the formula, you get an even greater degree of lunacy.
But you also get a trillion-dollar commercial success.
I don’t care how many contemporary molecular biologists are working in labs, amplifying invisible slivers of who knows what molecules into view, and calling them viruses; it’s a con. This also applies to biowar biologists trying to create super-germs. They’re all working in the dark vis-à-vis the natural processes of the body, which are far more complex and far more protective of health than these scientists know---unless the body is interfered with by direct poisons or gross mechanical destruction.
The history of human health shows that upgrades in public sanitation, hygiene, and improved nutrition have done more for people than all the “germ-fighting” pharmaceutical interventions ever invented laid end to end.
But THAT is not a trillion-dollar commercial success.
Even when tissue samples are taken from the body, properly separated through centrifuge, and then observed under an electron microscope, by the most competent and honest researchers, you still get dead pictures of dead particles. As researcher Karma Singh has pointed out, you don’t know, from those pictures, what such particles do or don’t do when they’re alive and integrated in the body. You can’t infer that they cause disease. The whole operation of the Virus Hunters is one brassy late-night infomercial tap dancing in the long, long history of humans on this planet.
You want germs? No one knows how many there are. From various estimates, we could be talking about thousands of trillions to the thousandth power. Maybe more. If an infinitesimal fraction of the critters caused serious disease, we’d not only all be dead, we’d be dead on dead on dead.
To begin to understand how overblown all these modern epidemic duds are, let’s go to the animals. Farm animals. Pigs. A headline blares: A MILLION PIGS SLAUGHTERED. African Swine Fever Virus was discovered, and in order to stop the contagion, death was rained down on the pigs. On the farm. On the giant factory farm. So a question arises:
Do you seriously think humans sat down next to each of the million pigs and tested him/her for the Virus? Drew a blood or tissue sample?
Twenty pigs tested positive and they killed the rest as matter of course. They always do.
But wait. What are the conditions on this massive million-pig factory farm? Let’s see. Pigs living in their own urine and feces, crowded next to one another, nose to butt, sprayed with toxic chemicals, eating chemical-laced feed---under high stress, never living the kind of existence they were designed for. Think they’re going to get sick? Think some kind of minimally reliable test might find a virus or two living and replicating in their bodies? Do you seriously think those viruses matter, contrasted against the OBVIOUS immunosuppressive ENVIRONMENT?
As the number one germ hunter of all time, Louis Pasteur, was reported to have confessed on his deathbed: it’s not the germ, it’s the terrain---meaning, it’s the body and its strength and vitality and resiliency---THAT should be the real focus of the healing profession. Building up health.
One problem. There’s no money in it.
Oops.
A final note for now: When I’m told that published studies reveal the coronavirus is actually an engineered bioweapon, from a lab, I repeat the assertion I’ve been making in this ongoing series of articles:
The researchers are using indirect methods of virus detection (PCR, antibody tests), and as a result, they have no idea what they’re discovering. It could be fragments of random DNA or RNA, cellular debris, germs that live quite comfortably in the body and never cause harm---and THEN, when the researchers assemble the genetic sequences of these unknown tiny objects and publish them; SO WHAT? And when other people come along and read these sequences and claim there are peculiarities which suggest bio-engineering has taken place, the whole mess of gibberish escalates to a higher level of absurdity. Yes, it has always been the case that biowar scientists in labs are maniacs fiddling and diddling with mixtures of chemicals and germs; and yes, they should all be stopped; but to say that NOW, these loons have precisely located the new coronavirus and are precisely altering it to produce an unstoppable force---that’s really quite a fantastical leap, and it’s a leap that leads into believing, all over again, that “one germ, one disease” is the pattern of the human body. The body deserves more credit than that.
They exist. They hijack cellular replicating mechanisms to reproduce, and, by invading particular cells, trigger immune system responses which produce the symptoms we associate with infectious respiratory diseases (the fever, et cetera, is not the result of the virus but of the inflammation response that goes along with the immune system working to clear the body of the virus).
And no, this is NOT speculation. Saying that all virology is speculation is, simply put, A LIE.
Facts matter. Research matters. Lies only matter when people are deluded into believing them--and examination of the facts always reveals lies as lies, and obligates the rational man to discard the lies.
Consider Sam Bailey and Jon Rappoport discarded as the liars they are. Permanently.
The Baileys offer to conduct a study to settle the debate. They are not like you who insist that the matter is settled. By dismissing them as "liars," you join the ranks of all the other authoritarians who insist "my way or the highway." If the dark theory of contagion is true, then allow critics to challenge it. If you are THEN correct, so be it. But to cavalierly dismiss all those who you disagree with you as "liars," reveals you to be a person of low character.
I dismiss them as liars because knowingly making demonstrably FALSE statements is what we call LYING.
Their depictions of the state of modern virology are demonstrably false, and the only way for them not to know that is for them to be wholly ignorant of the substance of modern virology--which itself renders their theories absurd. They can be malicious, or they can just be stupid. Take your pick.
And I am happy to allow anyone to challenge germ theory--in fact, I have no power to prevent such a challenge, even if I had the inclination to do so. But here's a tip: that challenge does not begin with "germ theory is false." When that's the opening statement, what follows is not a challenge to anything except the challenger's grasp of reality.
You're completely disingenuous. On one hand you say you are "happy" to allow anyone to challenge germ theory but because you cannot countenance the idea that people like the Baileys begin with the premise the theory is false, therefore you imply that their challenge would not be legitimate. A nice way of saying that you are "not happy" to see such a challenge.
No, I'm pointing out the basic logical reality that the conclusion cannot be the predicate. That's called circular logic--which is to say its false logic.
As Sam Bailey's arguments require that germ theory be false, his arguments cannot be used to disprove germ theory. That is a logical impossibility.
Einstein managed to trump Newton by demonstrating how Newton's theories led into contradictions which his theories of relativity were able to resolve. Using those theories he was able to predict a set of astronomical phenomena which were validated during the observation of a solar eclipse right after the end of WW1 (I want to say 1920, but I might be off by a year or two).
Galileo trumped Aristotle not by stating his theories were false but by showing his theories were false (just not by climbing the leaning tower of Pisa-that part is medieval urban legend).
That's how its done. Show how the new theory trumps the old--which you do not do by first discarding the old theory.
If Sam Bailey wants to disprove germ theory, he's welcome to try. So far he has to even start.
Second, I don't believe their challenge has to do with germ theory but more specifically whether Covid is the cause of disease.
Now I can live with the idea that viruses exist and can be the cause of disease.
What bothers me are the mandates, forced vaccinations, establishment of internment camps for the unvaccinated, demonization of the unvaccinated, lockdowns, mandatory masking, etc.
IF you're against such authoritarianism I can live with your beliefs. So do you take a stand against what's happened in the last three years?
The Sam Bailey paper to which you linked said that the past century of germ/contagion theory was false, and that viruses as a whole had never been isolated. Not SARS-CoV-2 (which has been isolated, just so we're clear).
Also, an important technical clarification: COVID is the disease, SARS-CoV-2 is the virus which causes the infectious respiratory disease we call COVID.
My stand on Pharmaceutical authoritarianism is well documented in this substack. Enjoy reading.
If they do exist, what is their function in the body? The "vast amount of research" you refer to are simply the speculative theories of mainstream virologists. Appealing to their authority does not make it fact.
I invite everyone reading this to see what Jon Rappoport had to say on this subject during the very early days of the so-called pandemic.
Damn! Will the Zombie Virus Apocalypse never come?
by Jon Rappoport
Continuing my "greatest COVID hits" articles. To read my introduction to this ongoing series, go here:. https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/10/03/introduction-to-my-greatest-covid-hits-series-of-articles/ To support my work and get value for value, order my Matrix collections here: https://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/ and subscribe to my substack here: https://jonrappoport.substack.com/
March 2, 2020
I write this piece for those who ordinarily have their heads on straight, when it comes to understanding the basics of HEALTH---but now, because of the “coronavirus epidemic,” are drifting back into the medical model: FIXATION ON GERMS.
A correct reading of suppressed medical history reveals that the hypothesis of “one disease, one germ” is a modern con, moving down a blind alley at midnight. And when you add “one vaccine” to the formula, you get an even greater degree of lunacy.
But you also get a trillion-dollar commercial success.
I don’t care how many contemporary molecular biologists are working in labs, amplifying invisible slivers of who knows what molecules into view, and calling them viruses; it’s a con. This also applies to biowar biologists trying to create super-germs. They’re all working in the dark vis-à-vis the natural processes of the body, which are far more complex and far more protective of health than these scientists know---unless the body is interfered with by direct poisons or gross mechanical destruction.
The history of human health shows that upgrades in public sanitation, hygiene, and improved nutrition have done more for people than all the “germ-fighting” pharmaceutical interventions ever invented laid end to end.
But THAT is not a trillion-dollar commercial success.
Even when tissue samples are taken from the body, properly separated through centrifuge, and then observed under an electron microscope, by the most competent and honest researchers, you still get dead pictures of dead particles. As researcher Karma Singh has pointed out, you don’t know, from those pictures, what such particles do or don’t do when they’re alive and integrated in the body. You can’t infer that they cause disease. The whole operation of the Virus Hunters is one brassy late-night infomercial tap dancing in the long, long history of humans on this planet.
You want germs? No one knows how many there are. From various estimates, we could be talking about thousands of trillions to the thousandth power. Maybe more. If an infinitesimal fraction of the critters caused serious disease, we’d not only all be dead, we’d be dead on dead on dead.
To begin to understand how overblown all these modern epidemic duds are, let’s go to the animals. Farm animals. Pigs. A headline blares: A MILLION PIGS SLAUGHTERED. African Swine Fever Virus was discovered, and in order to stop the contagion, death was rained down on the pigs. On the farm. On the giant factory farm. So a question arises:
Do you seriously think humans sat down next to each of the million pigs and tested him/her for the Virus? Drew a blood or tissue sample?
Twenty pigs tested positive and they killed the rest as matter of course. They always do.
But wait. What are the conditions on this massive million-pig factory farm? Let’s see. Pigs living in their own urine and feces, crowded next to one another, nose to butt, sprayed with toxic chemicals, eating chemical-laced feed---under high stress, never living the kind of existence they were designed for. Think they’re going to get sick? Think some kind of minimally reliable test might find a virus or two living and replicating in their bodies? Do you seriously think those viruses matter, contrasted against the OBVIOUS immunosuppressive ENVIRONMENT?
As the number one germ hunter of all time, Louis Pasteur, was reported to have confessed on his deathbed: it’s not the germ, it’s the terrain---meaning, it’s the body and its strength and vitality and resiliency---THAT should be the real focus of the healing profession. Building up health.
One problem. There’s no money in it.
Oops.
A final note for now: When I’m told that published studies reveal the coronavirus is actually an engineered bioweapon, from a lab, I repeat the assertion I’ve been making in this ongoing series of articles:
The researchers are using indirect methods of virus detection (PCR, antibody tests), and as a result, they have no idea what they’re discovering. It could be fragments of random DNA or RNA, cellular debris, germs that live quite comfortably in the body and never cause harm---and THEN, when the researchers assemble the genetic sequences of these unknown tiny objects and publish them; SO WHAT? And when other people come along and read these sequences and claim there are peculiarities which suggest bio-engineering has taken place, the whole mess of gibberish escalates to a higher level of absurdity. Yes, it has always been the case that biowar scientists in labs are maniacs fiddling and diddling with mixtures of chemicals and germs; and yes, they should all be stopped; but to say that NOW, these loons have precisely located the new coronavirus and are precisely altering it to produce an unstoppable force---that’s really quite a fantastical leap, and it’s a leap that leads into believing, all over again, that “one germ, one disease” is the pattern of the human body. The body deserves more credit than that.
They exist. They hijack cellular replicating mechanisms to reproduce, and, by invading particular cells, trigger immune system responses which produce the symptoms we associate with infectious respiratory diseases (the fever, et cetera, is not the result of the virus but of the inflammation response that goes along with the immune system working to clear the body of the virus).
And no, this is NOT speculation. Saying that all virology is speculation is, simply put, A LIE.
Facts matter. Research matters. Lies only matter when people are deluded into believing them--and examination of the facts always reveals lies as lies, and obligates the rational man to discard the lies.
Consider Sam Bailey and Jon Rappoport discarded as the liars they are. Permanently.
Here ends the discussion.
The Baileys offer to conduct a study to settle the debate. They are not like you who insist that the matter is settled. By dismissing them as "liars," you join the ranks of all the other authoritarians who insist "my way or the highway." If the dark theory of contagion is true, then allow critics to challenge it. If you are THEN correct, so be it. But to cavalierly dismiss all those who you disagree with you as "liars," reveals you to be a person of low character.
I dismiss them as liars because knowingly making demonstrably FALSE statements is what we call LYING.
Their depictions of the state of modern virology are demonstrably false, and the only way for them not to know that is for them to be wholly ignorant of the substance of modern virology--which itself renders their theories absurd. They can be malicious, or they can just be stupid. Take your pick.
And I am happy to allow anyone to challenge germ theory--in fact, I have no power to prevent such a challenge, even if I had the inclination to do so. But here's a tip: that challenge does not begin with "germ theory is false." When that's the opening statement, what follows is not a challenge to anything except the challenger's grasp of reality.
Ignaz Semmelweis knew better than that.
John Snow knew better than that.
I know better than that.
And now you know better than that.
You're completely disingenuous. On one hand you say you are "happy" to allow anyone to challenge germ theory but because you cannot countenance the idea that people like the Baileys begin with the premise the theory is false, therefore you imply that their challenge would not be legitimate. A nice way of saying that you are "not happy" to see such a challenge.
No, I'm pointing out the basic logical reality that the conclusion cannot be the predicate. That's called circular logic--which is to say its false logic.
As Sam Bailey's arguments require that germ theory be false, his arguments cannot be used to disprove germ theory. That is a logical impossibility.
Einstein managed to trump Newton by demonstrating how Newton's theories led into contradictions which his theories of relativity were able to resolve. Using those theories he was able to predict a set of astronomical phenomena which were validated during the observation of a solar eclipse right after the end of WW1 (I want to say 1920, but I might be off by a year or two).
Galileo trumped Aristotle not by stating his theories were false but by showing his theories were false (just not by climbing the leaning tower of Pisa-that part is medieval urban legend).
That's how its done. Show how the new theory trumps the old--which you do not do by first discarding the old theory.
If Sam Bailey wants to disprove germ theory, he's welcome to try. So far he has to even start.
If this distresses you, that's your problem.
First of all Sam Bailey is a woman.
Second, I don't believe their challenge has to do with germ theory but more specifically whether Covid is the cause of disease.
Now I can live with the idea that viruses exist and can be the cause of disease.
What bothers me are the mandates, forced vaccinations, establishment of internment camps for the unvaccinated, demonization of the unvaccinated, lockdowns, mandatory masking, etc.
IF you're against such authoritarianism I can live with your beliefs. So do you take a stand against what's happened in the last three years?
The Sam Bailey paper to which you linked said that the past century of germ/contagion theory was false, and that viruses as a whole had never been isolated. Not SARS-CoV-2 (which has been isolated, just so we're clear).
Also, an important technical clarification: COVID is the disease, SARS-CoV-2 is the virus which causes the infectious respiratory disease we call COVID.
My stand on Pharmaceutical authoritarianism is well documented in this substack. Enjoy reading.
Send me your links on this subject.
You're already there. Start at the top of the substack and work your way down.
I'm sure you'll find the answers you seek eventually.
Time to do your own research. Have at it.