Just speculation on my part, but the way they refer to these new shots as "boosters" to me suggests that the bureaucratic mindset of the Faucists is insisting on doing things in the "proper" order--because rules. If the shot is a "booster" then before you can get "boosted" you must first be inoculated. Otherwise it wouldn't be a booster,…
Just speculation on my part, but the way they refer to these new shots as "boosters" to me suggests that the bureaucratic mindset of the Faucists is insisting on doing things in the "proper" order--because rules. If the shot is a "booster" then before you can get "boosted" you must first be inoculated. Otherwise it wouldn't be a booster, which it has been declared to be.
Of course, the initial "boosters" were just additional doses of the original inoculations that were called "boosters", so don't expect the bureaucracy to have a firm grasp on reality. That's not the Faucist way.
Just speculation on my part, but the way they refer to these new shots as "boosters" to me suggests that the bureaucratic mindset of the Faucists is insisting on doing things in the "proper" order--because rules. If the shot is a "booster" then before you can get "boosted" you must first be inoculated. Otherwise it wouldn't be a booster, which it has been declared to be.
Of course, the initial "boosters" were just additional doses of the original inoculations that were called "boosters", so don't expect the bureaucracy to have a firm grasp on reality. That's not the Faucist way.