I know there is evidence of immunological harm from the Pfizer and Moderna shots, and I know that all the COVID shots are positively correlated with a number of life threatening conditions. I can't recall seeing anything that makes A-Z demonstrably more dangerous, but I certainly wouldn't rule it out.
However, relative to earlier infection waves, India is hardly experiencing a "surge".
I know there is evidence of immunological harm from the Pfizer and Moderna shots, and I know that all the COVID shots are positively correlated with a number of life threatening conditions. I can't recall seeing anything that makes A-Z demonstrably more dangerous, but I certainly wouldn't rule it out.
However, relative to earlier infection waves, India is hardly experiencing a "surge".
I'll try to find who it was, but someone (Steve Kirsch, perhaps?) I regard as credible was saying recently they concluded that A-Z was 6-7 times more deadly than Pfizer or Moderna.
There has been some MSM acknowledgement of vaccine harms in the UK recently, but nearly all focused on A-Z. Some regard that as a sort of 'limited hangout' - singling out A-Z as dangerous in hope that they can get people to overlook broader vaccine harms.
A-Z is the main inoculation used in the UK. Pfizer/Moderna are the primary ones here in the US.
There is one key distinction here: A-Z is a viral vector vaccine, much like Janssen.
I know that Janssen has not proven to be as dangerous as Pfizer/Moderna, although that may also be because its not as popular.
However, we should not get ahead of the data. Remember, India is having a "surge" in name only. So far this is not shaping up as an actual health crisis even by the terms of the Pandemic Panic Narrative.
I know there is evidence of immunological harm from the Pfizer and Moderna shots, and I know that all the COVID shots are positively correlated with a number of life threatening conditions. I can't recall seeing anything that makes A-Z demonstrably more dangerous, but I certainly wouldn't rule it out.
However, relative to earlier infection waves, India is hardly experiencing a "surge".
I'll try to find who it was, but someone (Steve Kirsch, perhaps?) I regard as credible was saying recently they concluded that A-Z was 6-7 times more deadly than Pfizer or Moderna.
There has been some MSM acknowledgement of vaccine harms in the UK recently, but nearly all focused on A-Z. Some regard that as a sort of 'limited hangout' - singling out A-Z as dangerous in hope that they can get people to overlook broader vaccine harms.
A-Z is the main inoculation used in the UK. Pfizer/Moderna are the primary ones here in the US.
There is one key distinction here: A-Z is a viral vector vaccine, much like Janssen.
I know that Janssen has not proven to be as dangerous as Pfizer/Moderna, although that may also be because its not as popular.
However, we should not get ahead of the data. Remember, India is having a "surge" in name only. So far this is not shaping up as an actual health crisis even by the terms of the Pandemic Panic Narrative.