Have you been following the developments regarding the IgG4 class switch phenomenon (i.e. tolerance) in those who have been jabbed two or more times with mRNA vaccines?
I'm wondering if strains like "Arcturus," while appearing to be no more lethal/harmful than your run-of-the-mill adenovirus, might cause significant problems (and increased deaths) in the 2x+ mRNA jabbed? If, upon infection with Arcturus, their immune system produces IgG4 antibodies, won't such individuals be susceptible to the long term damage done by their immune system tolerating a virus?
Don't suppose that could have anything to do with *vaccination* surging there?
After a slow start w/vaccination and a considerable number of deaths early on (less where states were using IVM) the death rate was way down and a big percentage of the population had been exposed to the disease.
If I'm getting the timeline right, *then* they started really pushing the vax - to the point where 94% if the population is vaxxed, and by far the biggest share of those are with 'Covishield' AKA Astra-Zeneca.
As if Pfizer or Moderna weren't dangerous enough - A-Z is multiple times dangerous, no?
I know there is evidence of immunological harm from the Pfizer and Moderna shots, and I know that all the COVID shots are positively correlated with a number of life threatening conditions. I can't recall seeing anything that makes A-Z demonstrably more dangerous, but I certainly wouldn't rule it out.
However, relative to earlier infection waves, India is hardly experiencing a "surge".
I'll try to find who it was, but someone (Steve Kirsch, perhaps?) I regard as credible was saying recently they concluded that A-Z was 6-7 times more deadly than Pfizer or Moderna.
There has been some MSM acknowledgement of vaccine harms in the UK recently, but nearly all focused on A-Z. Some regard that as a sort of 'limited hangout' - singling out A-Z as dangerous in hope that they can get people to overlook broader vaccine harms.
A-Z is the main inoculation used in the UK. Pfizer/Moderna are the primary ones here in the US.
There is one key distinction here: A-Z is a viral vector vaccine, much like Janssen.
I know that Janssen has not proven to be as dangerous as Pfizer/Moderna, although that may also be because its not as popular.
However, we should not get ahead of the data. Remember, India is having a "surge" in name only. So far this is not shaping up as an actual health crisis even by the terms of the Pandemic Panic Narrative.
But who believes there is really a new strain of Covid. They need to just stop already. I do not believe it. It’s for pomp and fear. Nothing more.
Long time lurker, first time commenter here. LOL
Have you been following the developments regarding the IgG4 class switch phenomenon (i.e. tolerance) in those who have been jabbed two or more times with mRNA vaccines?
I'm wondering if strains like "Arcturus," while appearing to be no more lethal/harmful than your run-of-the-mill adenovirus, might cause significant problems (and increased deaths) in the 2x+ mRNA jabbed? If, upon infection with Arcturus, their immune system produces IgG4 antibodies, won't such individuals be susceptible to the long term damage done by their immune system tolerating a virus?
While the inoculations have been shown to damage the immune system, so far there's no indication that Arcturus is all that deadly.
I don't rule out the possibility, but I don't believe there's any data to support it as of yet.
Covid surging in India?
Don't suppose that could have anything to do with *vaccination* surging there?
After a slow start w/vaccination and a considerable number of deaths early on (less where states were using IVM) the death rate was way down and a big percentage of the population had been exposed to the disease.
If I'm getting the timeline right, *then* they started really pushing the vax - to the point where 94% if the population is vaxxed, and by far the biggest share of those are with 'Covishield' AKA Astra-Zeneca.
As if Pfizer or Moderna weren't dangerous enough - A-Z is multiple times dangerous, no?
I know there is evidence of immunological harm from the Pfizer and Moderna shots, and I know that all the COVID shots are positively correlated with a number of life threatening conditions. I can't recall seeing anything that makes A-Z demonstrably more dangerous, but I certainly wouldn't rule it out.
However, relative to earlier infection waves, India is hardly experiencing a "surge".
I'll try to find who it was, but someone (Steve Kirsch, perhaps?) I regard as credible was saying recently they concluded that A-Z was 6-7 times more deadly than Pfizer or Moderna.
There has been some MSM acknowledgement of vaccine harms in the UK recently, but nearly all focused on A-Z. Some regard that as a sort of 'limited hangout' - singling out A-Z as dangerous in hope that they can get people to overlook broader vaccine harms.
A-Z is the main inoculation used in the UK. Pfizer/Moderna are the primary ones here in the US.
There is one key distinction here: A-Z is a viral vector vaccine, much like Janssen.
I know that Janssen has not proven to be as dangerous as Pfizer/Moderna, although that may also be because its not as popular.
However, we should not get ahead of the data. Remember, India is having a "surge" in name only. So far this is not shaping up as an actual health crisis even by the terms of the Pandemic Panic Narrative.