Reading this, at first I thought, ‘well this idea is nuts’. And what a bad legal precedent it would create - ten years from now, would they decide that an AI Chatbox is an ‘entity’ that should be allowed to vote?
But then you - with your ever-perceptive mind - pointed it out -delegated voting. That’s where they’re going with this. Bad, ba…
Reading this, at first I thought, ‘well this idea is nuts’. And what a bad legal precedent it would create - ten years from now, would they decide that an AI Chatbox is an ‘entity’ that should be allowed to vote?
But then you - with your ever-perceptive mind - pointed it out -delegated voting. That’s where they’re going with this. Bad, bad idea.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court may need to clarify not only what is a ‘person’, but what is ‘life’, which means they’ll have to wrestle with ‘a soul’. Good luck defining the legalities of that!
Reading this, at first I thought, ‘well this idea is nuts’. And what a bad legal precedent it would create - ten years from now, would they decide that an AI Chatbox is an ‘entity’ that should be allowed to vote?
But then you - with your ever-perceptive mind - pointed it out -delegated voting. That’s where they’re going with this. Bad, bad idea.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court may need to clarify not only what is a ‘person’, but what is ‘life’, which means they’ll have to wrestle with ‘a soul’. Good luck defining the legalities of that!
,