10 Comments
User's avatar
The Watchman's avatar

Good analysis as usual and will be linking today as usual @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/

Dimon always seems to have his hands in everything. Are the regulators regulating or facilitating? Irregardless Dimon continues to position JP Morgan as too big to fail. Either that, or they will be the last man standing!

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

In these days of regulatory capture, regulating IS facilitating.

Expand full comment
Gbill7's avatar

Two questions: are the holders of the common stock, preferred stock, and other liabilities taking a complete loss, with no recourse? And did JPMorgan get a sweet enough deal to incentivize big banks to manipulate more of such deals?

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

The FDIC seized First Republic Bank in its entirety, then sold the assets to JPM.

What the stockholders get will be for the FDIC to determine.

Expand full comment
Gbill7's avatar

Yikes for them!

Expand full comment
HenriO's avatar

Good analysis. Thanks! I don’t know if you’ve seen this or not, but the FDIC is considering tinkering with deposit insurance. One option is unlimited coverage of deposits.

https://www.fdic.gov/analysis/options-deposit-insurance-reforms/index.html

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

I had seen mention of it. Haven't had a chance to dive into the details yet.

It's not going to be an improvement, though.

Expand full comment
HenriO's avatar

Unlimited deposit insurance would just be another bail out.

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

As usual, I salute your brilliant explanation of the problem.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

You are most kind. Thank you.

Expand full comment