Thank you for that unapologetic review of the basis on which we make decisions. It is crucial that your argument be made often and much. Unapologetically!
If there is a subway rider prone to sneeze due to an infection, yes, a mask over his/her face would be useful. But all the other riders? They’re not doing aerosol-creating surgery, so…
Thank you for that unapologetic review of the basis on which we make decisions. It is crucial that your argument be made often and much. Unapologetically!
If there is a subway rider prone to sneeze due to an infection, yes, a mask over his/her face would be useful. But all the other riders? They’re not doing aerosol-creating surgery, so masking is useless. Except as a badge of compliance with tyranny.
Thank you for that unapologetic review of the basis on which we make decisions. It is crucial that your argument be made often and much. Unapologetically!
If there is a subway rider prone to sneeze due to an infection, yes, a mask over his/her face would be useful. But all the other riders? They’re not doing aerosol-creating surgery, so masking is useless. Except as a badge of compliance with tyranny.
What's amazing is how they keep recycling the same face mask studies as if they were never debunked in the first place.
Whenever I revisit a topic I at least check to see what updates there might be to the data.