I don't know how people can consider this to be less than a bioweapon. Just looking at the myriad of potential "side" effects lends that determination.
I don't know how people can consider this to be less than a bioweapon. Just looking at the myriad of potential "side" effects lends that determination.
The term "bioweapon" has, in my opinion, been overused. Strictly speaking, any therapeutic can be termed a bioweapon, as most all of them have at least some capacity to do harm. Opioids and fentanyl come to mind.
However, the potentials for harm from the mRNA inoculations are so great and so broad that discerning between malice and stupidity among inoculation advocates quickly becomes a distinction without a difference.
“How many Red Flags are enough?”
Peter Nayland Kust
I don't know how people can consider this to be less than a bioweapon. Just looking at the myriad of potential "side" effects lends that determination.
The term "bioweapon" has, in my opinion, been overused. Strictly speaking, any therapeutic can be termed a bioweapon, as most all of them have at least some capacity to do harm. Opioids and fentanyl come to mind.
However, the potentials for harm from the mRNA inoculations are so great and so broad that discerning between malice and stupidity among inoculation advocates quickly becomes a distinction without a difference.