7 Comments
β­  Return to thread

I'll respectfully stay out out of the political recommendations, not my country and all that.πŸ˜‰

But it is interesting to note- this phenomenon is occurring in lots of other countries as well.πŸ˜πŸ€”

Now I've been pondering it almost as long as I've been reading your stack, and I can only surmise:

A) consumers and governments to are completely inept and oblivious to the situation and buying as normal.πŸ€”

B) the consumers know we are in a global recession and are trying to put the brakes on their spending, but government are still spending like it's 2020, and denying it, so inflation😐.

C) the government is making every decision known to fiscal policy, economic science, and any joe/Jill who knows how to balance a checkbook/budget app, to purposely BREAK the financial system intentionally.🀨

In talking to people, I'm pretty sure b is occurring, but I personally think that c is the option.

As for media- they are towing the party line because they have been either a) told to from higher pay grades, or b) no one likes to be the bearer or bad news, so they are fingers crossed that the parents will step in an say the awful out loud for themπŸ˜‰πŸ€¨ given the level of maturity in media these days....πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈπŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ

Expand full comment

I don't believe any government is purposefully trying to break the financial system. Frankly I doubt there's anyone in any government anywhere that even fully understands the global financial system.

I have no doubt there are those in governments around the world who are not above using currency manipulations to advance their own power agendas. Perversely, that multiple governments are likely doing the same thing at more or less the same time is probably what has kept their shenanigans from blowing up in their face thus far. Everyone has essentially bought into the same fiat currency lies and so now all governments need to keep the system going or face a perfect storm of financial system collapse.

What is going to finally bring the system down is when enough governments make the same countercyclical mistakes in their currency manipulations at approximately the same time. We got a taste of this during the GFC when first the Fed and then the ECB both raised rates into a sputtering housing market in the US and a recession in Europe, triggering cascading margin calls everywhere.

With the global derivatives markets larger now than they were right before the GFC, when the cascade reaction gets triggered, I would not count on any government or central bank being able to pump enough currency into the system to prevent total collapse.

Expand full comment

Yes - what’s going to hit first, the Financial Singularity, when we have a total global financial collapse? Or the outbreak of WW3?

I try to look for optimistic possibilities, but the sheer weight of everything hanging over our heads sometimes makes that very difficult. Jeffrey Sachs, being interviewed yesterday by Tucker Carlson, mentioned a new book out, β€œNuclear War: a Scenario”. He described it as β€˜chilling’. I went to reserve a copy on the library’s website and there were already 211 people waiting to read it. Not a good sign, when that many people are sensing imminent demise.

But hey, maybe AI will harness fusion power, or figure out a super cheap way to desalinate the oceans while simultaneously cleaning up all the plastics in it. Artificial Intelligence could yet solve a lot of our problems - if it doesn’t exterminate us first!

Expand full comment

As far as desalinization of sea water so folks can drink it, the challenges aren't about cost but energy. The amount of energy required to desalinate at scale exceed that required for the United States to go all in on EVs.

Expand full comment

So, AI needs to master fusion energy first. Get on it, ChatGPT!

Expand full comment

I suspect it won't much matter which comes first, as the Financial Singularity is likely to trigger WW3, and WW3 will certainly trigger the Financial Singularity.

Interestingly enough, the nuclear scenario might not come to pass. There is a lot of speculation swirling around about whether Russia's nuclear arsenal even works, and if it doesn't then the scenarios which would normally trigger a Russian first strike on NATO will instead result in a sudden coup d'etat within the Kremlin. China has not been doing any nuclear saber rattling, so its hard to see a scenario coming about where they launch first.

Would NATO launch a nuclear first strike? Under the right circumstances, absolutely. But that would entail Russia prevailing in a conventional war with NATO, and given how things have transpired in Ukraine that seems a not likely scenario--Russian attrition tactics work because Ukraine does not have local air superiority, but Russia has not been able to establish local air superiority either.

With or without a nuclear strike, however, if either Israel-Hamas or Ukraine goes global, or if China invades Taiwan (which automatically goes global), just the act of forcing countries to line up on one side or the other is going to rip apart the global financial system--at which point that quadrillion in derivatives comes into play.

China and/or Russia might even hope to precipitate the Singularity, thinking their currencies can survive. They will, however, be mistaken. The ruble and the yuan are as much fiat currencies as the dollar, and neither Putin nor Xi Jinping is prepared to make the economic adjustments needed to backstop their currencies with gold (Putin can't do that and finance his war in Ukraine, while Xi can't do that while trying to stimulate the Chinese economy). Which means when the Singularity comes and the dollar colllapses, ALL currencies plummet to zero.

At that point terms like "civilizational collapse" start to apply.

Expand full comment

You have absolutely THE best mind, Peter. I love hearing your thoughts on all topics!

The hope I cling to is the fact that the future is seldom what you expect it to be. When I was an engineering student at the University of Minnesota, there was an actual club devoted to figuring out the ways that war with the USSR would play out. The hours when the club met conflicted with my work schedule, so I didn’t attend, but a friend of mine did. He told me how they’d figure, okay, if Russia invades Poland here, then NATO would counterattack this way at this point, and so on. Many of the club members were ROTC, so they were serious about figuring out how to win in different military scenarios. Many of the scenarios went nuclear; none, of course, ended well. Anyways, after postulating dozens of ways that war, including WW3, could happen, what actually did transpire? The USSR just rotted from within and effectively self-destructed! None of the military authors I read, none of the expert global analysts, virtually NO one (except Ayn Rand) saw it coming. All that worrying about the Cold War going hot never happen. (Yet.)

So that’s my hope - that something completely unexpected will happen to save civilization. It wouldn’t surprise me if you, Peter, see what’s evolving before anyone else does. And thanks in advance for that!

Expand full comment