I somewhat recall seeing that study. It is one of a growing number of studies dating back to 2021 showing that the inoculations are positively correlated to increasing COVID infection. Those studies all confirm the statistical signals Kyle Beattie uncovered with his Bayesian analysis, and which can be seen in the rates of infection as inoculation coverage increases in a country.
This touches on an important aspect of these studies. The ultimate measure of any drug's efficacy against COVID is going to be the broad epidemiological data. It is logically impossible to argue inoculation efficacy when COVID infections continue to rise even after the majority of a population has been inoculated. And while the precise significance eluded me at the time, the increased rates of infection observed in country after country that appeared AFTER inoculation coverage crosses the 50% threshold itself signals that the inoculations are contributing to that rate of infection.
So what all of these studies ultimately show is that those early signals from the epidemiological data were spot on, and shame on all the "experts" who ignored what the data has been shouting loudly since day one about the mRNA inoculations.
Here is a god article from last September on vaccination increasing your chance of infection.
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/09/28/vaccination-increases-infection-risk-by-44-oxford-study-finds/
I somewhat recall seeing that study. It is one of a growing number of studies dating back to 2021 showing that the inoculations are positively correlated to increasing COVID infection. Those studies all confirm the statistical signals Kyle Beattie uncovered with his Bayesian analysis, and which can be seen in the rates of infection as inoculation coverage increases in a country.
https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/how-many-red-flags-are-enough
https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/no-return-to-normal-in-sight
This touches on an important aspect of these studies. The ultimate measure of any drug's efficacy against COVID is going to be the broad epidemiological data. It is logically impossible to argue inoculation efficacy when COVID infections continue to rise even after the majority of a population has been inoculated. And while the precise significance eluded me at the time, the increased rates of infection observed in country after country that appeared AFTER inoculation coverage crosses the 50% threshold itself signals that the inoculations are contributing to that rate of infection.
So what all of these studies ultimately show is that those early signals from the epidemiological data were spot on, and shame on all the "experts" who ignored what the data has been shouting loudly since day one about the mRNA inoculations.