I’ve been reading quite a few media deep-dives on China in recent months, and yours, Peter, are always the best on every metric I can think of - hard data, comprehensiveness, insightful analysis and conclusions, wise interpretations, etc. You are not misled by anything, whether it’s propaganda, fudged data, or superficial coverage by rep…
I’ve been reading quite a few media deep-dives on China in recent months, and yours, Peter, are always the best on every metric I can think of - hard data, comprehensiveness, insightful analysis and conclusions, wise interpretations, etc. You are not misled by anything, whether it’s propaganda, fudged data, or superficial coverage by reporters. You are just the best, so thank you once again!
The Forbes editorial surprised me - are they really that superficially informed and naive about China’s culture and economy? It makes me think that their editorial was a paid piece by someone with interests in propping up China, or some similar explanation. Did you have that suspicion as well?
I’ve been reading quite a few media deep-dives on China in recent months, and yours, Peter, are always the best on every metric I can think of - hard data, comprehensiveness, insightful analysis and conclusions, wise interpretations, etc. You are not misled by anything, whether it’s propaganda, fudged data, or superficial coverage by reporters. You are just the best, so thank you once again!
The Forbes editorial surprised me - are they really that superficially informed and naive about China’s culture and economy? It makes me think that their editorial was a paid piece by someone with interests in propping up China, or some similar explanation. Did you have that suspicion as well?
It's not impossible.
Admirably sticking to the facts, as always.