Unlikely. The Ukraine allegations are before she was even in the Senate, so she wasn't part of the DC swamp when most of that went down.
There is always the infamous interrogatory "what did she know and when did she know it?" about current efforts by the Oval Office to frustrate the impeachment investigation. There's no impeachment equiva…
Unlikely. The Ukraine allegations are before she was even in the Senate, so she wasn't part of the DC swamp when most of that went down.
There is always the infamous interrogatory "what did she know and when did she know it?" about current efforts by the Oval Office to frustrate the impeachment investigation. There's no impeachment equivalent of misprision of a felony, but that is what would come back on her if there was anything.
However, as she is not even mentioned in the report, this is only trouble for her election campaign in a general sense regarding the corruption of the regime.
Your analysis is solid. Given that Harris wasn’t a part of the political landscape when the Ukraine dealings took place, it seems unlikely that she’d be directly implicated. However, as you point out, her proximity to the current administration might cast some suspicion on her, particularly if it comes to light that she’s privy to Biden’s efforts to hinder the impeachment investigation.
Even if Harris isn’t directly implicated, this whole affair could tarnish her already shady reputation by association. It’s a classic example of the old adage: “guilt by association.”
Unlikely. The Ukraine allegations are before she was even in the Senate, so she wasn't part of the DC swamp when most of that went down.
There is always the infamous interrogatory "what did she know and when did she know it?" about current efforts by the Oval Office to frustrate the impeachment investigation. There's no impeachment equivalent of misprision of a felony, but that is what would come back on her if there was anything.
However, as she is not even mentioned in the report, this is only trouble for her election campaign in a general sense regarding the corruption of the regime.
Your analysis is solid. Given that Harris wasn’t a part of the political landscape when the Ukraine dealings took place, it seems unlikely that she’d be directly implicated. However, as you point out, her proximity to the current administration might cast some suspicion on her, particularly if it comes to light that she’s privy to Biden’s efforts to hinder the impeachment investigation.
Even if Harris isn’t directly implicated, this whole affair could tarnish her already shady reputation by association. It’s a classic example of the old adage: “guilt by association.”
Thanks, Peter - jeez, you’re good at this!
I agree! Love reading Peter’s research and details.
Thank you all! I do appreciate all the kind words and support!