Red Pilled Doctor Brings Receipts
In A Peer Reviewed Journal, No Less
Doctor Russell L. Blaylock speaks some uncomfortable truths to the power of the medical establishment.
For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and “prevention”—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines. For the first time in history medical treatment, protocols are not being formulated based on the experience of the physicians treating the largest number of patients successfully, but rather individuals and bureaucracies that have never treated a single patient—including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, EcoHealth Alliance, the CDC, WHO, state public health officers and hospital administrators.[23,38]
Those who have been following the many voices arguing against the COVID-19 lockdowns, the experimental and ultimately dangerous inoculations, and the shameless propaganda pushed out as credible journalism on the pandemic will be very familiar with the particulars of this article.
It is still a worthwhile read. Dr Blaylock cites his evidence. The reader has the ability to interrogate the sources used to establish the assertions made. He might be wrong on this point or that (I've not yet vetted his evidences in detail), but his presentation of his assertions gives the critically thinking reader much to contemplate.
It also is not Dr. Blaylock's first exercise in truth telling. This article is an update to an earlier piece bringing forward much of the same information.
Is Dr. Blaylock completely accurate in all his particulars? Ultimately, I cannot say, not at this time. A thorough vetting will take time and that I have not done.
Yet it is significant that Dr Blaylock has had both his original article and this lengthy updated piece published in a peer reviewed journal, providing a nice bit of credentialed confirmation for the things that I myself, Steve Kirsch, Igor Chudov, Brian Mowrey, and so many more have been saying all along. Every such affirmation, large or small, makes us that much harder to dismiss as “misinformation spreaders.”
Even in the most severe censorship regimes, the truth has a way of getting out. The truth of COVID-19, of the Pandemic Panic Narrative, of the scientific bastardy of Faucism, of the criminal corruption of Big Pharma, and the malfeasance (and malevolence) of Big Government will be told. Dr Russell Blaylock's peer-reviewed truth bombs are proof.
Thanks for pointing to this article!
I'm reading through it right now. If anything, this is an extremely thorough article and I'm surprised it was published, although it appears that the journal (SNI) is an open-access journal which may have allowed an avenue to publication.
There are a few interesting parts in this article. It starts off rather tame and really calls out pharmaceutical manufacturers and the entire debacle of the COVID policies.
Then it dives deeper into things such as the "hot lots", which is a rather interesting area to go into.
I may write about this later today and dissect some parts of the article. I think more important than anything would be the public perception from this article.
"Yet it is significant that Dr Blaylock has had both his original article and this lengthy updated piece published in a peer reviewed journal"