38 Comments
User's avatar
Liz LaSorte's avatar

Maybe Harris supporters finally figured out that a vote for Harris is a vote for child abuse? Gender affirming “care” for minors who cannot legally consent to anything - let alone become a patient for life- is child abuse. Allowing human trafficking of minors through uncontrolled borders is child abuse. (At least 300,000 child immigrants have been “lost” ). Think not? Then, you need to think a little harder because at least half of the country already knows this.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

I certainly hope you are right that voters are realizing what Kamala Harris has actually done while in office.

Encouraging female genital mutilation as well as male genital mutiliation under the rubric of "gender affirming care" is bad enough, but that is, as you say, compounded by the regime's shameful complicity in the trafficking of 325,000 (and counting) childrem from the southern border, something i have brought up more than once not only here on Substack but across social media.

https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/kamala-harris-border-czar-to-traffickers

Of the millions who have come across the border illegally, very likely the majority of them are trafficking victims of one kind or another.

I surely hope people are realizing this about the (Biden-)Harris Regime.

Expand full comment
Liz LaSorte's avatar

IDK. Unfortunately, I’m afraid too many people have cognitive dissonance to see what is really happening - there are a lot of people voting for Harris.

Expand full comment
Bernardo de la Paz's avatar

Exhibit 52,367 to show that this election is rigged and the outcome is preordained.

Expand full comment
John Powell's avatar

Well reasoned commentary. Thank you

Expand full comment
Les Vitailles's avatar

Kamala Harris is sabotaging the Kamala Harris campaign, as with her cringe-worthy moment in Ann Arbor, MI where she asked the crowd to chant their names. Huh?

https://www.indiatoday.in/world/us-election-2024/story/us-presidential-elections-2024-kamala-harris-michigan-rally-video-shout-your-name-2624897-2024-10-29

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

Wow.

What’s beyond cringe? (Well, besides Kamala Harris that is)

Expand full comment
Hunterson7's avatar

Kamala is running like someone who already knows how the ballots are going to get counted.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

Possibly, but I don't see that.

Yes, she's campaigning as if she's just naturally entitled to the Presidency, but that's always been her demeanor. When Tulsi Gabbard curb-stomped her in the 2020 primary debate her public response was to say that she was a "top tier" candidate and Tulsi was just a wannabe looking for attention (it didn't save her campaign).

What I don't see in her campaign is anything that resembles confidence. Just the tone of her voice and the tension in her body when she speaks to me radiate a fundamental lack of confidence. Her deer in the headlights look when someone asks her a question is a look that to me just reeks of both lack of knowledge and lack of confidence.

Expand full comment
Hunterson7's avatar

In Houston it is looking like democrat turnout is down.

Since Kamala is the bait and switch candidate, her campaign strategy is to stick eith what got them this far.

Expand full comment
Paul Kirwin's avatar

Kamala needs no help in sabotaging her campaign. She’s got this.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

ROFLMAO!!!!!!

Touche!

Expand full comment
Enzo's avatar

She has to stop using Diddy's party guests…

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

She'd lose all her Hollyweird endorsements if she did that.

Expand full comment
Varangian's avatar

She’s sabotaging it herself. According to her own statements her internal polling is her instinct.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

She has said that, which is an amazing statement. Without data it is impossible to make informed rational decisions.

Expand full comment
Varangian's avatar

Without data it’s just opinions.

There seems to be an abundance of opinions in politics and policy of late.

Expand full comment
Toni Brown's avatar

One answer: Kamala Harris! She cannot articulate her stance on any issue. Literal word salads come out of her mouth, as if she were a school kid who didn’t read the assignment and has to write a 1,000 word essay on it! (Disclaimer: Former teacher here)

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

She was asked by a reporter during a recent campaign stop (over the weekend?) if she was seeing the same things in her campaign's internal polling that were being reported in the public polls. Her reply to the reporter was to the effect that she was trusting her instincts and not internal polling.

That sort of attitude would be very much in keeping with the self-sabotage starting at the top.

Expand full comment
Ahmed’s Stack of Subs's avatar

“bait and switch”

its been the entire theme of that party since the 2016 iowa caucus.

Expand full comment
The Watchman's avatar

The only reason they do this is to draw people to her rallies to make it look like she has more support than Trump. People have caught on to this unless they are totally ignorant!

Expand full comment
JohnG's avatar

Just a preview of another shit show that could be her presidency. Pray it doesn’t happen.

Expand full comment
James Gilman's avatar

Harris is taking more of a beating from Biden and Obama.

Expand full comment
Blue Republic's avatar

Yes.

I'm guessing the current AIPAC/Deep State plan is to let the Trump win come off and then replace him as soon as expedient with their more relible Mini-me, JDV.

Who will defer to his mentor Peter 'the CIA is a front for Palantir' Thiel.

Who, of course defers to...

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/peter-thiel-israel-palantir/

Expand full comment
Romgrp's avatar

🇺🇸. I’m in WI- I’ll add my vote for

T/V!

Expand full comment
Gbill7's avatar

Once again you’ve read my mind, Peter. I was just wondering these same questions today. What is going on with Kamala’s handlers? Why are they making poor choices regarding her time, priorities, appearances, etc? They’re pros - they could not possibly be this incompetent. A high school kid running for class President would make better campaign choices. And is it just me, or has Timmy dropped out of campaigning completely?

Somebody important - Obama, Pelosi? - seems to be instructing the campaign staff to screw up. An interesting mystery for you to solve, Peter...

Expand full comment
Julie's avatar

Her handler… if Mary serves it’s someone from Black rock. My take is they’re really smug the powers that be know how to steal the election. There’s a phenomenon, that people associate honesty with stupidity. Go figure.

Or this is gruesome, a Civil War will kill off a lot of us. Bill Gates gave $50 million to the left four or five times under different shadows. The Dutch are trying him. Maybe all that money was to cover up a dark secret. This is brainstorming. The truth is all of my information comes from you guys, especially the memes. Keep feeding my head. We are in this together. And Trump has the moral high ground. Believe

Expand full comment
Julie's avatar

Memory

Expand full comment
Gbill7's avatar

Oh, and is there any possible connection to the Washington Post’s sudden decision to not endorse Harris? Something’s up.

Expand full comment
Julie's avatar

That’s right

National markets are selling bonds because there’s other instruments that are more profitable because Trump’s going to win

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

The word filtering out from the WaPo newsroom is that the decision not to endorse came directly from Bezos.

Apparently, Bezos and top execs from his space company Blue Origin had a meeting with Trump—and after that meeting Bezos killed the endorsement.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/is-this-the-reason-bezos-owned-wapo-didn-t-endorse-harris/ar-AA1sWTK6

I actually believe that might be the case. Bezos is bending the knee to Trump because he wants to not be on the once and future President’s sh*t list.

Yet that line of reasoning only holds if Bezos believes Trump is going to be the future President. If Bezos believed Trump was going to lose, there’s no upside to bending the knee to him now.

And if Bezos was going to play this election safe, the order to kill any endorsement would have come down long ago, not at the last minute.

Bezos has to have a reason not merely to change the WaPo endorsement policy, but to change his mind about the WaPo endorsement policy. There has to be something that causes him to reevaluate an endorsement of Kamala Harris.

Bezos wants to do business with the next Administration. By spiking the WaPo endorsement he gave the world an excellent reason to surmise he now believes that next Administration will be helmed by Donald Trump.

Expand full comment
Gbill7's avatar

More smart reasoning by Peter, and another smart move by Trump!

Expand full comment