Re: The driver. While it is possible the driver was collateral damage, it would be difficult if not impossible to time the explosion so that it would go off right next to a tanker train. That level of precision indicates a manual detonation, either there in the truck or remote line of sight.
Re: The driver. While it is possible the driver was collateral damage, it would be difficult if not impossible to time the explosion so that it would go off right next to a tanker train. That level of precision indicates a manual detonation, either there in the truck or remote line of sight.
With scant evidence, and no evidence to the contrary, it seems to me that a suicide bomber truck driver is the parsimonious explanation here.
Re: The driver. While it is possible the driver was collateral damage, it would be difficult if not impossible to time the explosion so that it would go off right next to a tanker train. That level of precision indicates a manual detonation, either there in the truck or remote line of sight.
With scant evidence, and no evidence to the contrary, it seems to me that a suicide bomber truck driver is the parsimonious explanation here.