Just another example of one of many adverse events unreported to VAERS despite the requirement to do so. That doctor had NO RIGHT to outright dismiss that woman's issue. Sadly even a female doctor would probably dismiss that event. I would bet that the rate of cycle disruption is beyond the pale considering the already clear signal in VAERS. Disgusting.
Just another example of one of many adverse events unreported to VAERS despite the requirement to do so. That doctor had NO RIGHT to outright dismiss that woman's issue. Sadly even a female doctor would probably dismiss that event. I would bet that the rate of cycle disruption is beyond the pale considering the already clear signal in VAERS. Disgusting.
One of the potential flaws in the VAERS setup is that there are no clear delineations for where "beyond the pale" occurs,. While the increase in VAERS submissions for the mRNA inoculations is demonstrably several orders of magnitude beyond what has been observed for any prior vaccine product, there are no pre-defined thresholds within VAERS reporting to establish where the risks and adverse events become unacceptable.
Just another example of one of many adverse events unreported to VAERS despite the requirement to do so. That doctor had NO RIGHT to outright dismiss that woman's issue. Sadly even a female doctor would probably dismiss that event. I would bet that the rate of cycle disruption is beyond the pale considering the already clear signal in VAERS. Disgusting.
One of the potential flaws in the VAERS setup is that there are no clear delineations for where "beyond the pale" occurs,. While the increase in VAERS submissions for the mRNA inoculations is demonstrably several orders of magnitude beyond what has been observed for any prior vaccine product, there are no pre-defined thresholds within VAERS reporting to establish where the risks and adverse events become unacceptable.