Great article. Though I seriously doubt he is "cancer-free." Likely, they have it temporarily "under control." Furthermore, I'd suspect these folks to lie about his actual health status at this point. It would work better for the narrative if it seems like he has gone into remission, and then dies later, to make the death look "unrelated…
Great article. Though I seriously doubt he is "cancer-free." Likely, they have it temporarily "under control." Furthermore, I'd suspect these folks to lie about his actual health status at this point. It would work better for the narrative if it seems like he has gone into remission, and then dies later, to make the death look "unrelated" to the shots.
Here's the 5-year survival rate for Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: 43.4 percent
Seems to me if they wanted his eventual death unrelated to the shots this story should never be told. His lymphoma is the result of the shots--even Roxanne Khamsi essentially concedes that point. When it comes back, it will still be the result of the shots. When it puts him under the dirt, it will still be the result of the shots.
Great article. Though I seriously doubt he is "cancer-free." Likely, they have it temporarily "under control." Furthermore, I'd suspect these folks to lie about his actual health status at this point. It would work better for the narrative if it seems like he has gone into remission, and then dies later, to make the death look "unrelated" to the shots.
Here's the 5-year survival rate for Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: 43.4 percent
https://www.cancercenter.com/cancer-types/non-hodgkin-lymphoma/types/t-cell-lymphoma
Seems to me if they wanted his eventual death unrelated to the shots this story should never be told. His lymphoma is the result of the shots--even Roxanne Khamsi essentially concedes that point. When it comes back, it will still be the result of the shots. When it puts him under the dirt, it will still be the result of the shots.
Thanks to Roxanne Khamsi, that ship has sailed.