Have you looked at all cause mortality data from other countries?
England, Israel, Scotland, Canada?
These countries are ahead of the USA in terms of percentage of the population “fully vaxxed” / boostered, also ramped up prior to the USA (months earlier).
I looked at all cause mortality from England last autumn, it was eye-opening. Deaths increased post-vax campaign. Notable was the breakdown by age demographics: far younger sub-population succumbed than during the 2020 COVID-19 waves.
While some deaths are likely due to ‘societal’ factors (violence, alcoholism, drug abuse, crime, etc.), probably exacerbated by the lockdowns and aggressive masking policies, there could be a relation to the inoculations themselves. One needs to dig into the details.
I personally believe autopsies must be performed on all “unexpected, untimely, anomalous, surprising” deaths going forward.
I have not yet explored that particular data set in detail, although I am aware that all cause mortality is up in quite a few places.
I agree with you on the need for more autopsies. It may be impractical to autopsy every anomalous death, but even a subset of these deaths could reveal some important data.
Agreed. Autopsies on anomalous deaths where practical and agreed upon by next of kin. I might still have a link to the England data. Spreadsheet format, via Public Health Services, if I recall correctly.
You no doubt will have noticed that the U.K. & Ireland stopped publishing data on infections, hospitalisations and deaths as a function of vax status in early 2022.
The only reason the public health authorities would stop making data available to the general public is if the data failed to cooperate with the official narrative. (I can’t think of another reason).
Which is why it is important to emphasize that, even by the new definition, the shots still are problematic. They do not and have not provided protection.
Perhaps the CDC will change the definition of a vaccine yet again to "Big Pharma money maker that does no good and potentially much harm to the human body. " That would at least be honest.
They are that. However, since "worthless" also carries a second connotative definition of "contemptible; despicable", the term is still broadly appropriate at the 50,000 foot view of the data this article takes.
England data: Office of National Statistics, Age-standardised mortality rates, 2021.
If you have a Telegram account, I can send it to you.
Thanks. I can be reached on telegram at @allfactsmatter
Office for National Statistics
ons.gov.uk
You have to search a bit.
Eventually you can view all cause mortality rates for the entire year (Jan-Dec) 2021.
Have you looked at all cause mortality data from other countries?
England, Israel, Scotland, Canada?
These countries are ahead of the USA in terms of percentage of the population “fully vaxxed” / boostered, also ramped up prior to the USA (months earlier).
I looked at all cause mortality from England last autumn, it was eye-opening. Deaths increased post-vax campaign. Notable was the breakdown by age demographics: far younger sub-population succumbed than during the 2020 COVID-19 waves.
While some deaths are likely due to ‘societal’ factors (violence, alcoholism, drug abuse, crime, etc.), probably exacerbated by the lockdowns and aggressive masking policies, there could be a relation to the inoculations themselves. One needs to dig into the details.
I personally believe autopsies must be performed on all “unexpected, untimely, anomalous, surprising” deaths going forward.
I have not yet explored that particular data set in detail, although I am aware that all cause mortality is up in quite a few places.
I agree with you on the need for more autopsies. It may be impractical to autopsy every anomalous death, but even a subset of these deaths could reveal some important data.
Agreed. Autopsies on anomalous deaths where practical and agreed upon by next of kin. I might still have a link to the England data. Spreadsheet format, via Public Health Services, if I recall correctly.
You no doubt will have noticed that the U.K. & Ireland stopped publishing data on infections, hospitalisations and deaths as a function of vax status in early 2022.
The only reason the public health authorities would stop making data available to the general public is if the data failed to cooperate with the official narrative. (I can’t think of another reason).
The Power of Language. Just the change the meanings of words. Like Animal Farm.
Very much so.
Which is why it is important to emphasize that, even by the new definition, the shots still are problematic. They do not and have not provided protection.
Perhaps the CDC will change the definition of a vaccine yet again to "Big Pharma money maker that does no good and potentially much harm to the human body. " That would at least be honest.
Exactly.
Also, they are not worthless. Worthless implies neutral value, or null value.
They are negative efficacy with major side effects and death. They are a net loss.
They are that. However, since "worthless" also carries a second connotative definition of "contemptible; despicable", the term is still broadly appropriate at the 50,000 foot view of the data this article takes.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worthless
(I confess to having been a fan of William Safire's column "On Language" back in the day!)
To fully unpack the excess mortality data will take several articles.