All Facts Matter

Share this post

What Passes For "Debate" Among Wokesters

newsletter.allfactsmatter.us
Health Matters

What Passes For "Debate" Among Wokesters

They Really Believe This Stuff, Too!

Peter Nayland Kust
May 19, 2022
17
29
Share this post

What Passes For "Debate" Among Wokesters

newsletter.allfactsmatter.us

So I got into a Twitter debate with someone about Dr. Blaylock’s peer-reviewed “truth bombs.” The results would be entertaining were it not for the sad reality of people actually believing some of the nonsense they Tweet.

The thread started with the usual ad hominem attack on Dr. Blaylock.

Twitter avatar for @tatyana_md_phd
Tatyana MD, PhD @tatyana_md_phd
@jeffreyatucker Asking a neurosurgeon about a pandemic, is like asking a mechanic about mass transit congestion. It's not his field.
2:45 AM ∙ May 19, 2022
21Likes1Retweet

When I challenged her for a fact-based rebuttal of his article, she could not provide one.

Twitter avatar for @allfacts_matter
All Facts Matter @allfacts_matter
@tatyana_md_phd @jeffreyatucker Then you should have no problem composing a fact based rebuttal, with citations, to demonstrate his ignorance of the topic. Ad hominem attacks are logical fallacy not logical argument.
4:38 AM ∙ May 19, 2022
Twitter avatar for @tatyana_md_phd
Tatyana MD, PhD @tatyana_md_phd
@allfacts_matter @jeffreyatucker Been there, done that.
4:38 AM ∙ May 19, 2022
Twitter avatar for @allfacts_matter
All Facts Matter @allfacts_matter
@tatyana_md_phd @jeffreyatucker Not that I've seen. What you have tweeted is an ad hominem derogation of the messenger, studiously avoiding the message. Even for a PhD, that's a logical fallacy, not a logical argument.
9:54 AM ∙ May 19, 2022

Through multiple requests for even one link pointing to such a rebuttal (even a Tweet would have sufficed!), she never produced one.

Then she thought she’d get personal, and tried attacking my Substack (I should thank her for the publicity?). In particular, she took issue with my recent article on COVID risk assessment.

Twitter avatar for @tatyana_md_phd
Tatyana MD, PhD @tatyana_md_phd
@allfacts_matter @Bonbonhamilton @jeffreyatucker This is Dunning-Kruger, pure and simple. No one knows enough about the virus (or their own personal health) to even begin to make an accurate personal risk assessment for it. Furthermore, public health isn't based on personal risk assessment.
allfactsmatter.substack.comYet More Proof That “Expert” Is Wokespeak for “Blithering Idiot”Yes, You CAN Assess Your Own Personal Risk From COVID-19
1:02 PM ∙ May 19, 2022

Which is fine—I welcome debate and even challenges on my work. I never claim to have all the answers, and if someone points out where my analysis is flawed, or highlights a fact I’ve overlooked, then so be it. I will learn something, and so will my readers. That is always my overarching objective.

But then the triggered Tweeter decided to drop this bit of trigglypuff twatwafflery:

Twitter avatar for @tatyana_md_phd
Tatyana MD, PhD @tatyana_md_phd
@allfacts_matter @Bonbonhamilton @jeffreyatucker 1) Anything Covid related is about public health. So you don't understand Covid. 2) That says absolutely nothing about the accuracy of risk assessment. So you don't understand risk assessment either. As I said, Dunning-Kruger.
1:11 PM ∙ May 19, 2022

If it’s COVID, it’s never personal health, only public health.

Consider the implications of what she tweeted: “Anything COVID related is about public health”.

  • If you are infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, that’s not a personal health issue, but a public health issue.

  • If you take or do not take the mRNA inoculations, that is not a personal health issue, but a public health issue.

  • If you wear or do not wear a face mask, that is not a personal health issue, but a public health issue.

  • If you wash or do not wash your hands (eew!), that is not a personal health issue but a public health issue.

Think about that. The state of your body is not a personal health issue, but a public health issue.

Why is it important to publish the facts, the data, and the evidence about COVID and the Pandemic Panic Narrative on every platform possible? That tweet is why. The groupthink that has taken hold among the wokesters (Sage would call them zombies—and after that tweet thread there’s no real argument to her assessment!) is itself a direct attack on your individual person, your individual health, and your individual liberty.

My stance is always a simple one: I trust in the power and the right of the individual to make his own choices; I trust in you. I do not trust “experts”.

29
Share this post

What Passes For "Debate" Among Wokesters

newsletter.allfactsmatter.us
Previous
Next
29 Comments
variantk
Writes Variant-K
May 19, 2022Liked by Peter Nayland Kust

Risk assessment in 2022:

1. Here is a threat. Trust us.

2. Do these things to avoid the threat, or else.

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply by Peter Nayland Kust
Bandit
May 19, 2022Liked by Peter Nayland Kust

Scary, huh?

Expand full comment
Reply
2 replies by Peter Nayland Kust and others
27 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Peter Nayland Kust
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing