There's nothing natural or 'gnarly' about any of this.
The over reliance and obsession with vaccines is making experts coos-coo and flippant when they decide if it's a 'concern'. They figure, foolishly, 'what's the big deal? We got a vaccine for that!'.
And these moronic 'X% effective' claims. Can we stop it?
I don't believe any of it. All Bullwinkle pull a rabbit out of hat nonsense.
There's nothing natural or 'gnarly' about any of this.
The over reliance and obsession with vaccines is making experts coos-coo and flippant when they decide if it's a 'concern'. They figure, foolishly, 'what's the big deal? We got a vaccine for that!'.
And these moronic 'X% effective' claims. Can we stop it?
I don't believe any of it. All Bullwinkle pull a rabbit out of hat nonsense.
Having deconstructed Pfizer's initial extravagant efficacy claims on their COVID-19 shot, no, we shouldn't believe those numbers. For smallpox, the claims are best guesses, because smallpox is not an endemic pathogen anywhere in the world anymore. There is no practical way to test such vaccines, since smallpox itself was eradicated decades ago.
There's nothing natural or 'gnarly' about any of this.
The over reliance and obsession with vaccines is making experts coos-coo and flippant when they decide if it's a 'concern'. They figure, foolishly, 'what's the big deal? We got a vaccine for that!'.
And these moronic 'X% effective' claims. Can we stop it?
I don't believe any of it. All Bullwinkle pull a rabbit out of hat nonsense.
Having deconstructed Pfizer's initial extravagant efficacy claims on their COVID-19 shot, no, we shouldn't believe those numbers. For smallpox, the claims are best guesses, because smallpox is not an endemic pathogen anywhere in the world anymore. There is no practical way to test such vaccines, since smallpox itself was eradicated decades ago.