But if there are approximately 50 mutations in the 2022 variant, how can anyone assume that the existing vaccines will still be effective? Are the genetic mutations in areas that the vaccines traditionally target? If they have evolved to evade the human immune system then is it not plausible they can avoid the vaccines too?
There's nothing natural or 'gnarly' about any of this.
The over reliance and obsession with vaccines is making experts coos-coo and flippant when they decide if it's a 'concern'. They figure, foolishly, 'what's the big deal? We got a vaccine for that!'.
And these moronic 'X% effective' claims. Can we stop it?
I don't believe any of it. All Bullwinkle pull a rabbit out of hat nonsense.
Dec 18, 2021 I sent an email about the Atlantic's covid coverage that I found disturbing...this website, Weighty Matters.....http://www.weightymatters.ca/..... LOVES the Atlantic.....here it is...
Just a little note on the article that was just posted.....
Although I subscribe to the Atlantic and read a lot of their articles, something disturbs me.
At the end of every science article related to COVID, especially, you read this "The Atlantic’s COVID-19 coverage is supported by grants from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation."
This for me is a conflict of interest.
Chan Zuckerber is Mark Zuckerberg's wife and obviously tied to Facebook which is not a medical authority.
This organization is also funding vaccine projects......We also received $46,369 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in this quarter. SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project is made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The foundation has no control over our editorial decisions, and the views expressed on our website do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.
But if there are approximately 50 mutations in the 2022 variant, how can anyone assume that the existing vaccines will still be effective? Are the genetic mutations in areas that the vaccines traditionally target? If they have evolved to evade the human immune system then is it not plausible they can avoid the vaccines too?
There's nothing natural or 'gnarly' about any of this.
The over reliance and obsession with vaccines is making experts coos-coo and flippant when they decide if it's a 'concern'. They figure, foolishly, 'what's the big deal? We got a vaccine for that!'.
And these moronic 'X% effective' claims. Can we stop it?
I don't believe any of it. All Bullwinkle pull a rabbit out of hat nonsense.
Dec 18, 2021 I sent an email about the Atlantic's covid coverage that I found disturbing...this website, Weighty Matters.....http://www.weightymatters.ca/..... LOVES the Atlantic.....here it is...
Just a little note on the article that was just posted.....
Although I subscribe to the Atlantic and read a lot of their articles, something disturbs me.
At the end of every science article related to COVID, especially, you read this "The Atlantic’s COVID-19 coverage is supported by grants from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation."
This for me is a conflict of interest.
Chan Zuckerber is Mark Zuckerberg's wife and obviously tied to Facebook which is not a medical authority.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is connected to the J&J vaccine...conflict of interest?? https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/collections/our-history.html
This organization is also funding vaccine projects......We also received $46,369 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in this quarter. SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project is made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The foundation has no control over our editorial decisions, and the views expressed on our website do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.
https://www.factcheck.org/our-funding/
Anyway, not sure if you noticed who supports this science but for me it's problematic. I am not sure how these writings can be unbiased.
Thoughts?
Thanks in advance,
....by the way...who thinks he has responded to me??