12 Comments
Aug 5, 2022Liked by Peter Nayland Kust

The government is willing to give people a vaccine that gives 1% of the recipients heart problems for a disease that doesn't kill. I find it appalling that cardiac events are not considered "serious". I'll be interested to see what the heart issuedls are with double vacced/double boosted covidians, sure their heart problems are muuuuuch lower.

Saw this study over at market-ticker.org . Warning, they can be salty over there.

Link tonstudy below: https://www.drugs.com/sfx/smallpox-and-monkeypox-vaccine-side-effects.html

Sideffects:

Cardiovascular

None of the reported cardiac AESIs causally related to vaccination were considered serious.

Common (1% to 10%): Cardiac Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs - any cardiac signs or symptoms, changes in ECG, or troponin-1 elevations above 2 times the upper limit of normal)"

Expand full comment
author

The frustrating aspect of the Jynneos vaccine is the safety data is sparse and limited.

There are 31 adverse events recorded in VAERS, none of which appear to involve cardiac symptoms.

https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=SYM&EVENTS=ON&VAXMAN=BAVARIAN_NORDIC

And you are correct: the mortality from monkeypox is extremely low (3 deaths out of 25000+ cases)

Thus, while the extant data does not show frequent cardiac issues, the ethical dilemma remains the same--with no clear safety profile from the VAERS database, assurances from the CDC and various public health officials regarding the safety of the Jynneos vaccine are just pure bunk--there is simply no data on which to formulate an accurate safety profile.

And that makes actual informed consent an impossibility: when the doctor lies to the patient informed consent vanishes and ceases to exist. Pushing the monkeypox vaccine under these circumstances is an outright abdication of medical ethics.

Expand full comment

I think you can disregard VAERS for the foreseeable future. There now exists a massive vested interest to slow-walk all adverse reporting, because too many people are watching. To me, no data in VAERS doesn't mean nothing is happening it just means the data, if it exists isn't being reported, like the underground economy of workers waiting outside at Home Depot. Lots of work done, none reported to the IRS.

The wild thing to me is how common cardiac side-effect events are with Jynneos. 1%?!?!?! Yikes. That alone seems like an incredibly high individual risk for the West Afrian clade. Are the Health "experts" pushing the Monkeypox vaxx because of the endemic grift that exists in medicine now? Why are they ignoring the large risk of heart damage to the patient when the only issue appears to be temporary pain? Or do the people at the top know that this was another gain-of-function experiment result from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and they are worried that the trashed immune systems of the West cannot fight off the Monkeypox? Probably a bit of both. I read the MPV is mutating faster than modeled in the last 5 years, soooooo....

Too late now, we are a vaccine nation, and each year, the fear will ramp up until these vaxxed husks shuffle off their mortal coil. Never thought America would die this way, always thought it would be nukes with the Russians, not Monkeypox Covidzombies eating us for breakfast.

Expand full comment
author

Keep in mind that the historical mortality for the West African clade is reported at 3-6%, and for the Central African clade as high as 10%.

The mortality for smallpox before its eradication went as high as 30%+ in some outbreaks.

This is another example of how the public health agencies are conflating what should be properly regarded as two separate outbreaks of what are almost two different viruses--and should at the very least be regarded as different clades. The virus in the global outbreak beyond Africa has only 3 recorded deaths out of 25,000+ cases, while the West African clade in Nigeria and neighboring countries have about 5 deaths for 350 cases. The Central African clade is quite likely behind the 1500 or so suspected cases in the Central African Republic and its neighboring countries, as well as the 70 some odd deaths.

Thus the cardiac risk for Jynneos against the observed mortality of the global outbreak strain makes the vaccine not a good idea. For the West African clade it becomes a bit more problematic, and for the Central African clade a case can be made that the risk-reward benefit inures in favor of getting vaccinated.

It's also worth noting that the safety profile for Jynneos is reported to be a significant improvement over the ACAM2000 vaccine. These are, remember, first and foremost smallpox vaccines--a sufficiently dangerous pathogen that makes the risk much more easily justified. (particularly since a resurgence of smallpox at this juncture would almost certainly be an act of biological terrorism).

Expand full comment

Question: With probably the majority of the people getting the monkey vaxx, which I have read can cause smallpox, already coof vaxxed, which lowers immunity, couldn't this cause a smallpox outbreak? Am I confusing the monkey vaxxes?

Please help me understand.

Expand full comment
author

Both Jynneos and ACAM2000, the other vaccine used are both intended as smallpox vaccines, to replace the older Dryvax vaccine.

Based on observational studies from the 1980s, after smallpox vaccines were discontinued, researchers assessed that smallpox vaccines are ~85% effective against monkeypox.

While both Jynneos and ACAM2000 use the vaccinia virus, relying on the strong cross-reactive immunity to immunize against smallpox and monkeypox.

As such, it is not possible for the Jynneos vaccine to cause an outbreak of smallpox, which is the variola pathogen.

Expand full comment
Aug 6, 2022Liked by Peter Nayland Kust

Thank-you very much for answering my question! I appreciate your helping me understand.

Expand full comment
Aug 5, 2022Liked by Peter Nayland Kust

I'm no a medical guy, just an old engineer with a background in statistics, but those odds with the Jynneos shot.are horrific. There really is no upside, and ethically, such a boondoggle for doctors, everyone loses.

Thanks for the great work, I enjoy your posts.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks!

Expand full comment
Aug 4, 2022Liked by Peter Nayland Kust

"Stigmatizing," yes, that is a good one.

It shows the totally unserious nature of this, or pretty much any, response.

Expand full comment
deletedAug 5, 2022·edited Aug 5, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

'Jeder Arzt, wenn er seine Approbation in den Händen hält, weiß genau, dass

er einer kriminellen Vereinigung "Pharmamafia" beigetreten ist'.

Das kann man nicht ändern, man kann sich aber von den Kollegen abgrenzen,

die im Mainstream schwimmen.

Und die Beweise, dass die "Medizin" nur nahezu 100%ige Scharlatanerie ist,

sind absolut erdrückend.

"Das Ziel muss die Umwandlung aller Gesunden in Kranke sein"

Expand full comment